Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5475
Next month in: 02:28:46
Server time: 13:31:13, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): JourneyJak | Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Capital Punishment Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Mostly Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2357

Description[?]:

Legislation regarding capital punishment.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:52:50, January 25, 2007 CET
FromMostly Liberal Party
ToDebating the Capital Punishment Act
Messagehttp://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=97337

We'd like to see the GLDS not abstain from this this time.

Date12:23:21, January 25, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Tukarali Democratic Party
ToDebating the Capital Punishment Act
MessageWe will support.

Date20:39:43, January 25, 2007 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Capital Punishment Act
MessageWe're on the fence. We are against the death penalty, but we do not take a hard-line stance on it; We could live with the current law as well..

Date22:21:48, January 25, 2007 CET
FromMostly Liberal Party
ToDebating the Capital Punishment Act
MessageIf you're going to stick with the current law you'd better try and change the extradition laws because at present, they contradict. We, however, will not support a change in the extradition law.

Date10:43:34, January 31, 2007 CET
FromMostly Liberal Party
ToDebating the Capital Punishment Act
MessageWell...?

Date00:12:25, February 09, 2007 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Capital Punishment Act
MessageWe will not change the extradiction laws, as we do not think they contradict. The currect extradiction policy says nothing about the death penalty, it states that we do not extradict to nations that practice cruel or inhumane treatment of suspects, so nations who torture their prisoners are out of the question.
Should our policy state that we do not extradict to nations with capital punishment (which is another available option at the extradiction issue), while we ourself allow the death penalty, then that would contradict.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 176

no
 

Total Seats: 153

abstain
  

Total Seats: 132


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "When there's a single thief, it's robbery. When there are a thousand thieves, it's taxation. " -Vanya Cohen

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57