We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Beluzian Business Bureau[?]
This page contains information about the Beluzian Business Bureau.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Republic of Beluzia (Beluzia)
Seats[?] in Assembly of deputies[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate federalist | excellent | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate permissive | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | moderate | perfect |
Foreign Relations | extreme internationalist | excellent | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | small government-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Market | laissez-faire-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | moderate progressive | excellent | perfect |
Religion | moderate secular | limited | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
March 4734 | 23,598,636 | 64,431,549 | 36.63 | +36.63 | 185 | 500 | 37.00 | +185 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Beluzian Business Bureau.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
National Unity Coalition | June 4574 | December 4574 | defeated | ||
PLP Manifesto pt.I | August 4571 | December 4571 | defeated | ||
Parental Leave Act | February 4570 | February 4570 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of October 4567 | October 4567 | October 4567 | passed | ||
Corporations Tax Act 4566 | October 4566 | July 4567 | defeated | ||
Conviction Review Act | September 4566 | September 4566 | passed | ||
National Budget 4566 | May 4566 | July 4567 | passed | ||
Elimination of Handguns Act 4565 | November 4565 | April 4566 | passed | ||
Terrorism Deterrence Act 4565 | November 4565 | April 4566 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, September 4565 | September 4565 | September 4565 | passed | ||
OOC: Republic of Beluzia Income Statistics(4565) | January 4565 | September 4668 | passed | ||
Income Tax Act 4565 | January 4565 | October 4565 | passed | ||
Declaration fo War on Narikaton and Darnussia | January 4565 | January 4565 | defeated | ||
Market Deregulation Act | April 4564 | April 4564 | defeated | ||
Emergency Powers | April 4564 | April 4564 | defeated | ||
Ratification of the Beluzian - Hobrazian Treaty of Military Cooperation | October 4563 | October 4563 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of October 4563 | October 4563 | October 4563 | passed | ||
(Revisit) Matrimonial Act 4555 | June 4563 | June 4564 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, February 4563 | February 4563 | February 4563 | passed | ||
Executive Powers Act 4562 | November 4562 | June 4563 | defeated |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |