We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Illustrious Party[?]
This page contains information about the Illustrious Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Illustrious
Nation[?]: United States of Baltusia (Baltusia)
Seats[?] in Congress of the United States[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | federalist-leaning | limited | perfect |
Civil Rights | permissive-leaning | limited | perfect |
Ecology | environmentalist-leaning | limited | perfect |
Foreign Relations | internationalist-leaning | limited | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | big government-leaning | limited | perfect |
Market | laissez-faire-leaning | limited | perfect |
Military | militarist-leaning | limited | perfect |
Morality | progressive-leaning | limited | perfect |
Religion | religious-leaning | limited | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
May 2092 | 253 | 18,309,211 | 0.00 | +0.00 | 0 | 420 | 0.00 | +0 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Illustrious Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Child Protection Law | February 4516 | February 4516 | defeated | ||
Union Freedom Act | February 4516 | February 4516 | defeated | ||
Budget proposal of November 4515 | November 4515 | November 4515 | passed | ||
Education deregulation reform act September 4515 | September 4515 | September 4515 | defeated | ||
Polygamy ban act September 4515 | September 4515 | September 4515 | passed | ||
Nationality Reform Act | April 4515 | April 4515 | defeated | ||
Limitied foreign policy act March 4515 | March 4515 | March 4515 | passed | ||
Infrastructure act March 4515 | March 4515 | March 4515 | defeated | ||
Religious promotion act March 4515 | March 4515 | March 4515 | defeated | ||
Reversal of Socialism Act | March 4515 | March 4515 | defeated | ||
Rmoval of Draconian Environmental Reglations Act | March 4515 | March 4515 | defeated | ||
Return to Sanity Act | September 4514 | September 4514 | passed | ||
National Pride Act | September 4514 | September 4514 | passed | ||
Build The Wall Act | September 4514 | September 4514 | passed | ||
Make Baltusia Great Again Act | July 4514 | July 4514 | passed | ||
Make Baltusia's Government Moral Act | July 4514 | July 4514 | passed | ||
Make Baltusia Moral Again Act | July 4514 | July 4514 | passed | ||
Make Baltusia Pro-Life Again Act | July 4514 | July 4514 | passed | ||
Make Baltusia's Military Decent Again Act | July 4514 | July 4514 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of December 4512 | December 4512 | December 4512 | passed |
Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |