We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Progressief Atheïstisch Verbond[?]
This page contains information about the Progressief Atheïstisch Verbond.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Lord_Tyrell
Nation[?]: Federale Republiek van Seridjan (Saridan)
Seats[?] in Volksraad (People's Council)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
The Progressive Atheïst Union is a party that stands for a religion free Saridan. We believe that religion slows down progress and is the cause of inequality in Saridan. We believe that progress is often achieved through violence against the intolerant in our society and that spreading our ideology will liberate the world. Ideology: - Militant Atheïsm - (Techno) Progressivism - Transhumanism - Egalitarianism - Environmentalism - Militarism |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | high | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate permissive | moderate | perfect |
Ecology | convinced environmentalist | limited | perfect |
Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate big government | high | perfect |
Market | regulator-leaning | moderate | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | extreme progressive | limited | perfect |
Religion | extreme secular | limited | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
January 4413 | 18,679,642 | 50,698,646 | 36.84 | +36.84 | 187 | 500 | 37.40 | +187 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Progressief Atheïstisch Verbond.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Call for early elections, May 2716 | May 2716 | May 2716 | defeated | ||
Rights for our process | May 2716 | May 2716 | passed | ||
Naked is Beautiful | April 2716 | April 2716 | passed | ||
Federalism | April 2716 | April 2716 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of November 2715 | November 2715 | November 2715 | defeated | ||
Ecology | October 2715 | March 2716 | defeated | ||
Drug Reforms | October 2715 | March 2716 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of October 2715 | October 2715 | October 2715 | passed | ||
Police | September 2715 | April 2716 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, September 2715 | September 2715 | September 2715 | defeated | ||
Changes | September 2715 | September 2715 | passed | ||
Name Changes | April 2715 | September 2715 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of April 2715 | April 2715 | April 2715 | defeated | ||
Foreign Born Citizens | April 2715 | April 2715 | passed | ||
Voting Age | April 2715 | April 2715 | passed | ||
Moral Reform | November 2714 | June 2715 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of November 2714 | November 2714 | November 2714 | defeated | ||
Bill of 2714 | May 2714 | November 2714 | defeated | ||
Ridding our country of the plague of State-Promoted Religious Persecution | November 2713 | November 2713 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of September 2713 | September 2713 | September 2713 | passed |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |