We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Luthori Imperial Party[?]
This page contains information about the Luthori Imperial Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Holy Luthorian Empire (Luthori)
Seats[?] in Imperial Diet (lower house), Imperial Senate (upper house)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Formed in July 3829 in the Imperial Duchy of Yodukan. The party seeks to uphold Imperial honor and an Imperial System of government above all else. According to the policies of Johannes Halibrent, the founder of the LIP, and continued by his successors, the party is willing to compromise some of its ideals to give progress to the Crown and his Government. Dissolved by order of the Hundred Council of the LIP at the request of the Dissolutionist faction by a majority vote of (51-49) in January 3849. Royal Sponsors: The Yodukan-Villayn Family (August 3837 - January 3849) History of Royal Sponsors: 1. Richard I Yodukan-Villayn: August 3837 - January 3849 Party Motto: Per virtutem, et imperium tenuit. / By our strength, the Empire is maintained. Founder: Johannes Halibrent Party Organizations: -Order of the Silver Lion: A party organization with the explicit goals of grooming future leaders of the party and to foster the military spirit of the LIP. Membership currently restricted to male adults and teenagers. Established April 3840. -----Current Membership: 176,702 -----Organization Leader: Isiah Wells -----Notable Members: Klemens Jenigan -Order of the Silver Eagle: The counterpart of the Order of the Silver Lion. The Order of the Silver Eagle has the same goals as its counterpart. Membership currently restricted to female adults and teenagers. Established June 3840. -----Current Membership: 690,774 -----Organization Leader: Josephine Best Party Factions: Dissolutionists - This faction, beliving that the LIP does not face a future of success or believe that the LIP have encountered much success in the past, have become disillusioned with the party, demanding that the party be dissolved. ----- Faction Strength: 62% Leadship: ((FF)=Founding Father) 1. July 3829 - July 3837: Johannes Halibrent (FF) / Albrect von Yodukan 2. August 3837 - December 3839: Saloman Hardy (FF) / Richard I Yodukan-Villayn 3. January 3840 - December 3844: Howard Patrick (FF) / (NO CHANGE) 4. January 3845 - January 3849: Chrystal Fenn (FF) / (NO CHANGE) |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate restrictive | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | moderate skeptic | moderate | perfect |
Foreign Relations | isolationist-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | big government-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Market | regulator-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Military | convinced militarist | excellent | perfect |
Morality | moderate conservative | excellent | perfect |
Religion | secular-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
August 3832 | 3,156,532 | 55,663,778 | 5.67 | +5.67 | 6 | 105 | 5.71 | +6 |
August 3837 | 6,957,012 | 59,507,901 | 11.69 | +6.02 | 11 | 105 | 10.48 | +5 |
January 3840 | 9,999,031 | 61,192,931 | 16.34 | +4.65 | 56 | 350 | 16.00 | +45 |
January 3845 | 7,817,273 | 63,488,558 | 12.31 | -4.03 | 43 | 350 | 12.29 | -13 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Luthori Imperial Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Luthori needs a cabinet | June 4953 | June 4953 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, September 4952 | September 4952 | September 4952 | passed | ||
Use of Torture by the Police Forces Act | February 4952 | February 4952 | defeated | ||
Segragation Act | February 4952 | February 4952 | defeated | ||
Next Cabinet Negotiations | December 4951 | December 4951 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, March 4951 | March 4951 | March 4951 | passed | ||
Judicial System Reform Act | January 4951 | January 4951 | defeated | ||
Private members' bill: Segregation Act 4951 | January 4951 | January 4951 | defeated | ||
National Parks Act 4951 | December 4950 | December 4950 | passed | ||
The Conservative Act | July 4950 | July 4950 | defeated | ||
Shipleyriding Coalition Vote | June 4950 | June 4950 | passed | ||
4950 Duchy election results | June 4950 | June 4950 | passed | ||
Reaction of Louise of Hurrington to the election results | February 4950 | February 4950 | passed | ||
Private members' bill: Anti-Satanailic Act 4950 | December 4949 | February 4950 | defeated | ||
Private members' bill: Education Act 4950 | December 4949 | February 4950 | defeated | ||
Forestry Act 4949 | February 4949 | February 4949 | defeated | ||
Exotic Animals Act 4949 | February 4949 | February 4949 | passed | ||
Film Act 4949 | February 4949 | February 4949 | defeated | ||
Banning the Left Act | December 4948 | December 4948 | defeated | ||
Ducal Diets Act | November 4948 | July 4971 | defeated |
Random fact: Voters have an extra appreciation for bills that actually get passed, so if you want to maximally take profit from your votes, make sure you compromise with others. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |