We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Federal Republic Progressionist Party[?]
This page contains information about the Federal Republic Progressionist Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: dailyshowfan14
Nation[?]: Imārat-i Ahmādī-yi Sahel / Ahmadi Emirate of Solentia (Solentia)
Seats[?] in Assemblea Provvisoria[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
OOC: AGAINST SOPA AND PIPA! Originally known as the Federal Republic Progressionist Party, FRPP for short, the party was founded in the summer of 3162 with beliefs that everyone is equal. The first ever party leader was David McCann who, like all the other leaders so far, couldn't win the head of state elections. He was the runner-up for three years in a row. The party is now known as the Progressionist Solentian Caucus Party, or PSCP for short. The party stands up for equal rights, a safe environment, a strong military, pro-choice, and more. The PSCP's headquarters is in Pinara, Shinatawa. PARTY LEADERS 1st party leader David McCann, 3162-3180 David McCann was the first ever leader and the first to make it to the head of state elections. While he made it three times in a row, he lost every time due to the lack of endorsements. David was the longest serving leader till Jack Hennington's term as leader. 2nd party leader James Robert 3180-3182 What many people look back upon to be the worst serving leader, James Robert made many promises, none of which were fulfilled. He was soon assassinated making him the first to be assassinated and the leader with the shortest term. 3rd party leader Jack Hennington 3182-3203 The second longest serving leader so far Jack was a man of few words. He was never able to win the head of state elections and was never actually voted to be leader. He took over the party after the assassination of James Robert. The party never prospered under Hennington's term. 4th party leader Dillon Hamilton 3203-3227 The party did well under was is being called the best leader so far. He was the first leader to make it to the head of state elections since David McCann. The party's seat number in the senate has dramatically increased since he took control. Dillon Hamilton was the first ever Progressionist president, winning in a landslide over the SPP, and then the FIP. He is the longest serving leader, serving 23 years. 5th Party leader Gregory Johnson 3227-3242 He was the only president to win the head of state every time. He continued to ride the boom started from the Hamilton administration. The party was at its highest seat percentage ever, having majority control of the senate for one term. He is widely considered one of the best presidents for the numerous treaties ratified to help solentia stay on the right course even after he left office. SUPREME PRESIDENTS 1-Dillon Hamilton, 4th party leader. 3218-3224 2-Gregory Johnson, 5th party leader. 3230-32242 3-Kyle McDenson, 6th Party leader. 3242-3248 |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate federalist | high | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate permissive | high | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | limited | perfect |
Foreign Relations | moderate internationalist | moderate | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | small government-leaning | high | perfect |
Market | moderate regulator | high | perfect |
Military | moderate militarist | moderate | perfect |
Morality | progressive-leaning | high | perfect |
Religion | convinced secular | high | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
July 3184 | 3,937,562 | 64,510,532 | 6.10 | +6.10 | 24 | 425 | 5.65 | +24 |
June 3187 | 1,876,872 | 63,370,591 | 2.96 | -3.14 | 12 | 425 | 2.82 | -12 |
December 3189 | 2,811,291 | 62,511,148 | 4.50 | +1.54 | 19 | 425 | 4.47 | +7 |
December 3192 | 6,371,510 | 61,820,344 | 10.31 | +5.81 | 43 | 425 | 10.12 | +24 |
December 3195 | 2,490,923 | 63,615,118 | 3.92 | -6.39 | 15 | 425 | 3.53 | -28 |
December 3198 | 5,976,891 | 63,034,371 | 9.48 | +5.57 | 39 | 425 | 9.18 | +24 |
December 3201 | 4,512,146 | 63,747,570 | 7.08 | -2.40 | 29 | 425 | 6.82 | -10 |
December 3204 | 10,471,122 | 61,068,716 | 17.15 | +10.07 | 75 | 425 | 17.65 | +46 |
December 3207 | 11,196,351 | 60,171,984 | 18.61 | +1.46 | 80 | 425 | 18.82 | +5 |
December 3210 | 8,552,441 | 57,973,709 | 14.75 | -3.85 | 62 | 425 | 14.59 | -18 |
December 3213 | 10,138,452 | 61,242,014 | 16.55 | +1.80 | 70 | 425 | 16.47 | +8 |
July 3215 | 15,810,254 | 61,052,002 | 25.90 | +9.34 | 111 | 425 | 26.12 | +41 |
July 3218 | 17,205,525 | 65,201,679 | 26.39 | +0.49 | 115 | 425 | 27.06 | +4 |
July 3221 | 13,684,973 | 58,231,182 | 23.50 | -2.89 | 100 | 425 | 23.53 | -15 |
July 3224 | 15,506,584 | 59,695,009 | 25.98 | +2.48 | 111 | 425 | 26.12 | +11 |
July 3227 | 17,030,281 | 56,611,892 | 30.08 | +4.11 | 128 | 425 | 30.12 | +17 |
July 3230 | 28,200,948 | 58,279,164 | 48.39 | +18.31 | 205 | 425 | 48.24 | +77 |
July 3233 | 28,181,661 | 58,321,045 | 48.32 | -0.07 | 206 | 425 | 48.47 | +1 |
July 3236 | 29,921,218 | 59,919,025 | 49.94 | +1.61 | 214 | 425 | 50.35 | +8 |
July 3239 | 27,130,051 | 57,476,043 | 47.20 | -2.73 | 199 | 425 | 46.82 | -15 |
July 3242 | 25,065,082 | 57,608,097 | 43.51 | -3.69 | 185 | 425 | 43.53 | -14 |
July 3245 | 24,308,012 | 55,544,682 | 43.76 | +0.25 | 186 | 425 | 43.76 | +1 |
July 3248 | 20,990,222 | 60,827,288 | 34.51 | -9.26 | 151 | 425 | 35.53 | -35 |
July 3251 | 27,018,707 | 62,395,810 | 43.30 | +8.79 | 186 | 425 | 43.76 | +35 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Federal Republic Progressionist Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Ecology Bill of 3903 | February 3903 | February 3903 | defeated | ||
Economic Bill of 3903 | February 3903 | February 3903 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of January 3902 | January 3902 | January 3902 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of September 3901 | September 3901 | September 3901 | passed | ||
Unionism Act 3901 | September 3901 | September 3901 | passed | ||
Call for early elections, September 3901 | September 3901 | September 3901 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, February 3901 | February 3901 | February 3901 | passed | ||
Nuclear Weaponry Act | November 3899 | November 3899 | defeated | ||
POW Legislation | November 3899 | November 3899 | defeated | ||
National Curriculum | November 3899 | November 3899 | passed | ||
Small-Scale Privatisation | November 3897 | November 3897 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of October 3896 | October 3896 | October 3896 | defeated | ||
Partially-Subsidized Pharmaceutical Drugs | July 3896 | May 3897 | passed | ||
Compulsary Education | July 3896 | May 3897 | passed | ||
Semi-liberalism | August 3895 | September 3895 | passed | ||
Ratification of the Dorvik-Kanjor Friendship Treaty | January 3895 | January 3895 | defeated | ||
Health Semi-Liberalisation | December 3894 | December 3894 | defeated | ||
Some changes | October 3894 | October 3894 | passed | ||
Lower pollution regulation | May 3893 | May 3893 | defeated | ||
Budget proposal of May 3893 | May 3893 | May 3893 | passed |
Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |