We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
New People's Party[?]
This page contains information about the New People's Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Yekobura Fēdērēshini (Cobura)
Seats[?] in Chamber of Workers Deputies[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
The New People's Party is the spiritual successor to the People's Revolutionary National League, a party which was disbanded some time ago. We believe that the PRNL pursued truly enlightened policies for the good of all Coburans, and seek to resurrect the hopes for a Great New Society. This is the true will of the People, and it is our duty to enact it. Manifesto of the Great New Society: Foreign policy: We believe in the aggressive promotion of Coburan values in Terra. We do not believe in the infiltration of non-Coburans. Civil and Economic Regulation: Having too many freedoms, to put it simply, clutters life. By reducing this clutter, the minds of citizens are freed. Therefore, only by eliminating so-called "freedoms" of the Individualist movement will we achieve true liberty. Environmentalism: Coburans take priority over trees. As true patriots, we will not hesitate to burn a forest if it saves a single life. Federalism: To progress, Cobura must act as a single organism. Allowing regions to control issues themselves is deleterious to the Great New Society. http://i.imgur.com/6mJTP.png |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | convinced skeptic | excellent | perfect |
Foreign Relations | convinced isolationist | excellent | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | small government-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Market | regulator-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Military | moderate militarist | excellent | perfect |
Morality | conservative-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Religion | moderate secular | excellent | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
August 3011 | 384,210 | 392,880,985 | 0.10 | +0.10 | 0 | 501 | 0.00 | +0 |
August 3015 | 53,334,496 | 260,913,301 | 20.44 | +20.34 | 109 | 501 | 21.76 | +109 |
July 3018 | 91,990,345 | 547,180,333 | 16.81 | -3.63 | 84 | 501 | 16.77 | -25 |
July 3022 | 98,117,559 | 464,449,382 | 21.13 | +4.31 | 107 | 501 | 21.36 | +23 |
July 3026 | 112,803,573 | 531,412,845 | 21.23 | +0.10 | 107 | 501 | 21.36 | +0 |
January 3030 | 112,848,224 | 573,965,562 | 19.66 | -1.57 | 99 | 501 | 19.76 | -8 |
February 3033 | 89,302,952 | 569,032,868 | 15.69 | -3.97 | 77 | 501 | 15.37 | -22 |
July 3220 | 18,064,670 | 57,100,835 | 31.64 | +15.94 | 213 | 665 | 32.03 | +136 |
July 3224 | 10,937,066 | 59,999,092 | 18.23 | -13.41 | 123 | 665 | 18.50 | -90 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the New People's Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Focus on the Family | February 2760 | February 2760 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of December 2759 | December 2759 | February 2761 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of October 2759 | October 2759 | November 2759 | defeated | ||
communist act | October 2759 | October 2759 | defeated | ||
Economic Reforms of 2759 | September 2759 | September 2759 | passed | ||
Senate Ammendment of 2759 | August 2759 | December 2759 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of August 2759 | August 2759 | August 2759 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of August 2759 | August 2759 | August 2759 | passed | ||
NEW BILL | April 2759 | April 2759 | defeated | ||
Foreign Policy Renewal Act of 2759 | February 2759 | July 2759 | passed | ||
Healthcare Reform of 2559 | February 2759 | February 2759 | passed | ||
Needed Funds | February 2758 | February 2758 | defeated | ||
Education Reform of 2757 | December 2757 | December 2757 | defeated | ||
Animal Protection Bill of 2757 | December 2757 | December 2757 | passed | ||
Military Reform of 2757 | September 2757 | September 2757 | passed | ||
justice reform act and education | August 2757 | August 2757 | defeated | ||
ecology reform act | August 2757 | August 2757 | defeated | ||
healthcare morality act | August 2757 | August 2757 | defeated | ||
capitilist reform | August 2757 | August 2757 | defeated | ||
Budget proposal of August 2757 | August 2757 | August 2757 | passed |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |