We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Entente Demócrata[?]
This page contains information about the Entente Demócrata.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: República de Egelion (Egelion)
Seats[?] in Congreso Nacional de Egelion[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Our party believes that it is a moment of democracy, of pragmatism, and that is our program. Pragmatism and new faces for solving old problems. Leader: Jordi Abós Election Results: 3905: 10 seats 3907:29 seats 3909:20 seats 3911: 38 seats 3913: 39 seats Leader: Gýula Hováks, JD 3915: 34 seats 3917:37 seats 3919: 38 seats 3920:39 seats 3921: 29 seats 3923:75 seats 3925: 42 seats Leader:José Hiraldo, JD 3929: 150 seats 3931: 149 seats 3935:92 seats 3939:93 seats Leader: Sofía López, PhD 3943: 74 seats Consulii: José Hiraldo, JD and Antonio Alcántara, JD 3947: 85 seats 3951: 79 seats Consulii: István Vas, PhD and Antonio Alcántara, JD |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate federalist | moderate | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | moderate | perfect |
Ecology | moderate environmentalist | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | extreme internationalist | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate big government | high | perfect |
Market | moderate regulator | high | perfect |
Military | pacifist-leaning | close to none | perfect |
Morality | conservative-leaning | limited | perfect |
Religion | secular-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
February 3905 | 2,494,431 | 13,463,601 | 18.53 | +18.53 | 10 | 75 | 13.33 | +10 |
February 3907 | 8,819,404 | 18,466,483 | 47.76 | +29.23 | 29 | 75 | 38.67 | +19 |
February 3909 | 19,932,925 | 58,585,983 | 34.02 | -13.74 | 25 | 75 | 33.33 | -4 |
February 3911 | 15,950,106 | 23,807,864 | 67.00 | +32.97 | 38 | 75 | 50.67 | +13 |
February 3913 | 13,683,809 | 22,229,276 | 61.56 | -5.44 | 39 | 75 | 52.00 | +1 |
February 3915 | 12,355,330 | 21,727,742 | 56.86 | -4.69 | 34 | 75 | 45.33 | -5 |
February 3917 | 13,200,686 | 21,857,159 | 60.40 | +3.53 | 37 | 75 | 49.33 | +3 |
February 3919 | 16,744,687 | 24,151,601 | 69.33 | +8.94 | 38 | 75 | 50.67 | +1 |
March 3920 | 17,878,484 | 24,608,831 | 72.65 | +3.32 | 39 | 75 | 52.00 | +1 |
November 3921 | 4,776,160 | 12,884,825 | 37.07 | -35.58 | 29 | 75 | 38.67 | -10 |
November 3923 | 11,736,322 | 11,756,130 | 99.83 | +62.76 | 75 | 75 | 100.00 | +46 |
October 3925 | 5,178,298 | 35,387,459 | 14.63 | -85.20 | 42 | 150 | 28.00 | -33 |
October 3929 | 11,825,025 | 11,880,686 | 99.53 | +84.90 | 150 | 150 | 100.00 | +108 |
November 3931 | 11,854,773 | 12,020,852 | 98.62 | -0.91 | 149 | 150 | 99.33 | -1 |
November 3935 | 25,000,233 | 37,350,484 | 66.93 | -31.68 | 92 | 150 | 61.33 | -57 |
November 3939 | 33,258,094 | 50,350,667 | 66.05 | -0.88 | 93 | 150 | 62.00 | +1 |
May 3943 | 27,630,593 | 50,915,167 | 54.27 | -11.79 | 74 | 150 | 49.33 | -19 |
May 3947 | 30,504,986 | 52,873,171 | 57.69 | +3.43 | 85 | 150 | 56.67 | +11 |
May 3951 | 26,753,573 | 50,465,458 | 53.01 | -4.68 | 79 | 150 | 52.67 | -6 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Entente Demócrata.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Abortion Rights | April 2541 | March 2542 | passed | ||
Welfare Reform. | December 2540 | July 2542 | defeated | ||
Embassy Ban | December 2540 | July 2542 | defeated | ||
Treaty Withdrawl | December 2540 | February 2541 | defeated | ||
Post Office | December 2540 | February 2541 | defeated | ||
Polaris Party Relaunch Bill 8: Welfare and Religion | December 2539 | December 2539 | defeated | ||
Polaris Party Relaunch Bill 7: Civil Liberties | December 2539 | December 2539 | defeated | ||
Polaris Party Relaunch Bill 6: Ecology | December 2539 | December 2539 | passed | ||
Polaris Party Relaunch Bill 5: Culture | December 2539 | December 2539 | defeated | ||
Polaris Party Relaunch Bill 4: Education | December 2539 | December 2539 | passed | ||
Polaris Party Relaunch Bill 3: justice | December 2539 | December 2539 | passed | ||
Polaris Party Relaunch Bill 2: Economics | December 2539 | December 2539 | defeated | ||
Polaris Party Relaunch Bill 1: Health | December 2539 | December 2539 | defeated | ||
Genetically Modified Food | October 2538 | January 2539 | defeated | ||
Budget proposal of April 2538 | April 2538 | June 2538 | defeated | ||
National Parks | February 2538 | November 2538 | defeated | ||
Foreign Aid | May 2537 | February 2538 | passed | ||
Education Reform | May 2537 | February 2538 | defeated | ||
Malpractice | May 2537 | February 2538 | passed | ||
Media | May 2537 | February 2538 | passed |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |