We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
National Fiscal Group[?]
This page contains information about the National Fiscal Group.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Anantonese Empire (Kalistan)
Seats[?] in National Assembly of Deputies[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
| The National Fiscal Group was established in 2144 to protect the interests of the Kalistani people from those who would seek to undermine her economy. The NFG is committed to a non-discriminatory, pragmatic approach to government which favours state intervention only in the case of national interest. |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
| Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
| Centralization | unitarist-leaning | high | perfect |
| Civil Rights | moderate permissive | excellent | perfect |
| Ecology | convinced skeptic | excellent | perfect |
| Foreign Relations | internationalist-leaning | limited | perfect |
| Government Responsibilities | convinced small government | excellent | perfect |
| Market | moderate laissez-faire | excellent | perfect |
| Military | moderate militarist | high | perfect |
| Morality | moderate progressive | excellent | perfect |
| Religion | convinced secular | excellent | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
| Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
| May 2145 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | +0.00 | 51 | 213 | 23.94 | +51 |
| February 2146 | 3,306 | 32,773,889 | 0.01 | +0.01 | 0 | 213 | 0.00 | -51 |
| December 2148 | 5,224,161 | 23,479,430 | 22.25 | +22.24 | 48 | 213 | 22.54 | +48 |
| June 2152 | 5,437,212 | 27,324,943 | 19.90 | -2.35 | 43 | 213 | 20.19 | -5 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the National Fiscal Group.
| Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
| Income tax proposal of January 2422 | January 2422 | March 2423 | defeated | ||
| SLP: A Change in the Wind | March 2421 | August 2421 | passed | ||
| RFP Platform Act | August 2420 | February 2421 | defeated | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of March 2420 | March 2420 | March 2420 | passed | ||
| Embassies Act | December 2417 | April 2418 | defeated | ||
| Waste Disposal Act | December 2417 | April 2418 | passed | ||
| Anti-Fascist Act | December 2417 | December 2417 | defeated | ||
| Environmental Positioning Act | December 2417 | December 2417 | passed | ||
| Aid to foreign countries act | July 2416 | August 2416 | defeated | ||
| Sport act | July 2416 | August 2416 | defeated | ||
| Health Improvement Act | February 2416 | August 2416 | passed | ||
| Budget proposal of June 2415 | June 2415 | August 2415 | passed | ||
| Income tax proposal of June 2415 | June 2415 | August 2415 | passed | ||
| Kalistan Improvement Act | March 2415 | June 2415 | defeated | ||
| School Freedom Compromise Act 1a | March 2415 | June 2415 | passed | ||
| Nominations for the 5th Constitutional Court | September 2414 | October 2612 | defeated | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of December 2413 | December 2413 | January 2607 | defeated | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of October 2413 | October 2413 | October 2413 | passed | ||
| No Child Left Behind Bill | July 2413 | April 2414 | defeated | ||
| School Freedom Act 1 | July 2413 | September 2413 | defeated |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson |