We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Dundorfer Nationale Front[?]
This page contains information about the Dundorfer Nationale Front.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Jan-PatrickBollstrom
Nation[?]: Bundesrepublik Dundorf (Dundorf)
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
DUNDORFER, ERSTEHEN! "die Staat ist Gehorsamspflicht und wir sind die Staat!", "State is a duty to obey and we are the State" Dundorfer Nationale Front is national-conservative party formed in Sudschloss-am-der-Czimnetz in Grozvic to ensure the rights of the bourgeois and the middle-class, which they feel are way too oppressed by the left-winger's and such. Communist's are taking the civil rights of the bourgeois and handing it to the poor, like it was porridge. -Taking permissive stance on civil rights and liberties, believing in a fair society, where people live in equality under goverment's watchful eye -Loose economic regulations for building an economic society, lowering taxes for stimulating the economy, fighting against the unemployment and income gap -Centralization and minimalization of goverment, federalism is just way too complicated and hard, while centralized goverment works like a charm in every day needs Candidates for Bundespräsident: Hermann Schauber (2415-2416) Hermann Schauber (2416-2418) Günther Oettinger (2418-2420) Günther Oettinger (2420-2421) Ernst Röehm (2421-2423) Ernst Röehm (2423-2425) |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate unitarist | limited | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate restrictive | limited | perfect |
Ecology | moderate skeptic | limited | perfect |
Foreign Relations | moderate isolationist | moderate | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Market | moderate laissez-faire | close to none | perfect |
Military | moderate militarist | moderate | perfect |
Morality | conservative-leaning | moderate | perfect |
Religion | moderate secular | moderate | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
March 2416 | 43,674 | 91,783,617 | 0.05 | +0.05 | 0 | 598 | 0.00 | +0 |
March 2418 | 9,635,327 | 84,316,816 | 11.43 | +11.38 | 69 | 598 | 11.54 | +69 |
March 2420 | 11,817,382 | 82,314,313 | 14.36 | +2.93 | 86 | 598 | 14.38 | +17 |
March 2421 | 9,357,903 | 81,539,890 | 11.48 | -2.88 | 67 | 598 | 11.20 | -19 |
March 2423 | 10,748,100 | 86,873,132 | 12.37 | +0.90 | 75 | 598 | 12.54 | +8 |
March 2425 | 8,418,520 | 86,485,255 | 9.73 | -2.64 | 57 | 598 | 9.53 | -18 |
March 2427 | 4,120,878 | 84,582,513 | 4.87 | -4.86 | 30 | 598 | 5.02 | -27 |
March 2429 | 5,265,509 | 95,868,335 | 5.49 | +0.62 | 31 | 598 | 5.18 | +1 |
March 2431 | 1,809,510 | 90,960,418 | 1.99 | -3.50 | 11 | 598 | 1.84 | -20 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Dundorfer Nationale Front.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
dogs | July 2068 | July 2068 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, July 2068 | July 2068 | July 2068 | defeated | ||
Communal Farms Act II | May 2068 | May 2068 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of May 2068 | May 2068 | May 2068 | passed | ||
Education agenda reversal | May 2068 | May 2068 | passed | ||
Reversing moral agenda | May 2068 | May 2068 | passed | ||
Common Culture Act | May 2068 | May 2068 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of November 2066 | May 2067 | May 2067 | defeated | ||
Education agenda reversal, section II | January 2067 | January 2067 | defeated | ||
Education agenda reversal, section I | January 2067 | January 2067 | defeated | ||
Reversing Moral agenda, section II | January 2067 | January 2067 | defeated | ||
Reversing Moral agenda, section I | January 2067 | January 2067 | defeated | ||
Tuition Fees Abolition Act | October 2066 | October 2066 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of June 2066 | June 2066 | June 2066 | passed | ||
Non-National Anthem | June 2066 | June 2066 | passed | ||
Farming Rights | May 2066 | May 2066 | passed | ||
Cloning Illegalization | May 2066 | May 2066 | passed | ||
Prision Reform | May 2066 | May 2066 | defeated | ||
Public Saftey Act | May 2066 | May 2066 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of May 2066 | May 2066 | May 2066 | defeated |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |