We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Národný Prevratný Bojisko (NUC)[?]
This page contains information about the Národný Prevratný Bojisko (NUC).
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Cakaniye Cumhuriyeti (Jakania)
Seats[?] in Cumhuriyet Meclisi (Assembly of the Republic)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
| The Národný Prevratný Bojisko (National Revolutionary Front) was founded July 1st, 2648 by former leading members of the disbanded Deltárska Prevratný Socialistický Strana of Deltaria. Foremost amongst those former DPSS members that moved to Jakania was Milada Kristýna Salak , the last party leader of the DPSS. Numerous other members of the ruling cadre of the DPSS joined Milada Salak in Jakania, including such notable party members as Livia Rakyta and Andrej Rakyta, formerly high-ranking members of the Rakytaovska Dynasty. |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
| Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
| Centralization | convinced unitarist | excellent | perfect |
| Civil Rights | convinced restrictive | excellent | perfect |
| Ecology | moderate skeptic | excellent | perfect |
| Foreign Relations | convinced isolationist | excellent | perfect |
| Government Responsibilities | convinced big government | excellent | perfect |
| Market | extreme regulator | excellent | perfect |
| Military | convinced militarist | excellent | perfect |
| Morality | conservative-leaning | excellent | perfect |
| Religion | convinced secular | excellent | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
| Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
| June 2649 | 129,107 | 168,389,409 | 0.08 | +0.08 | 0 | 350 | 0.00 | +0 |
| June 2652 | 30,860,719 | 169,068,460 | 18.25 | +18.18 | 65 | 350 | 18.57 | +65 |
| January 2654 | 30,216,808 | 175,987,067 | 17.17 | -1.08 | 17 | 100 | 17.00 | -48 |
| January 2656 | 39,815,472 | 167,597,956 | 23.76 | +6.59 | 26 | 100 | 26.00 | +9 |
| January 2658 | 39,025,030 | 182,963,359 | 21.33 | -2.43 | 23 | 99 | 23.23 | -3 |
| January 2660 | 34,525,713 | 182,625,739 | 18.91 | -2.42 | 20 | 99 | 20.20 | -3 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Národný Prevratný Bojisko (NUC).
| Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |