We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Socialistiska Forum[?]
This page contains information about the Socialistiska Forum.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Tælmörksríki / Kingdom of Telamon (Telamon)
Seats[?] in Landsthingi (National Assembly)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
The Socialist Forum The SF is a leftwing big tent party representing mainly socialists but also social democrats, social liberals and Hosian socialists. It was founded on November 2, 3489 after the collapse of the hosian democratic HVP and was joined by dissidents from the DNV as well. Policies Nationalisation of major industries Progressive Taxation Very strong welfare state Environmentalism Unitary governance Moderate pacifism Structure The SF is led by a party leader assisted by a deputy leader. Both are elected by the parliamentary party through the exhaustive ballot method. Each candidate has to be nominated by one eight of the entire SF parliamentary caucus. Each kingdom has its own party organisation mirroring the national one. The kingdom parties nominate delegates who congregate annually along with the national leadership at a conference where party policy stances are decided. Leaders Ingrid Larsson (interim) Nov 3489 - Feb 3490 Trond Johansson Feb 3490 - Deputy Leaders Viscount Erik Bergvall Feb 3490 - |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate permissive | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Foreign Relations | convinced internationalist | high | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate big government | excellent | perfect |
Market | convinced regulator | excellent | perfect |
Military | moderate militarist | excellent | perfect |
Morality | moderate progressive | excellent | perfect |
Religion | secular-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
December 3483 | 7,860,431 | 33,143,098 | 23.72 | +23.72 | 118 | 499 | 23.65 | +118 |
October 3484 | 10,107,764 | 38,671,902 | 26.14 | +2.42 | 130 | 499 | 26.05 | +12 |
April 3487 | 12,636,889 | 59,897,672 | 21.10 | -5.04 | 105 | 499 | 21.04 | -25 |
April 3491 | 13,731,770 | 50,031,569 | 27.45 | +6.35 | 142 | 499 | 28.46 | +37 |
June 3492 | 22,876,577 | 32,726,176 | 69.90 | +42.46 | 356 | 499 | 71.34 | +214 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Socialistiska Forum.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Milutin Nicin's Cabinet Proposal of March 2817 | March 2817 | March 2817 | defeated | ||
Vojislav Krkljus proposes Reform (RRP) Act 1 | March 2817 | March 2817 | defeated | ||
Religious Reform Act of 2817 | February 2817 | March 2817 | passed | ||
Call for early elections, February 2817 | February 2817 | February 2817 | defeated | ||
Milutin Nicin's Cabinet Proposal of January 2817 | January 2817 | March 2817 | defeated | ||
Military reform | August 2816 | August 2816 | defeated | ||
Milutin Nicin's Cabinet Proposal of March 2816 | March 2816 | March 2816 | defeated | ||
Telamon-Lodamun Friendship Treaty Withdrawal | September 2815 | October 2815 | passed | ||
DPT reform | August 2815 | February 2816 | passed | ||
Religoius Regulations Act | May 2815 | October 2816 | defeated | ||
Dangerous Pets Act | May 2815 | October 2816 | passed | ||
National Service Act | May 2815 | October 2816 | passed | ||
Abortion Illegalization Act of 2815 | May 2815 | October 2815 | passed | ||
Foreign Aid Act. | November 2814 | November 2814 | passed | ||
National Health Protection Act | October 2814 | October 2814 | defeated | ||
Whaling Act | October 2814 | October 2814 | defeated | ||
Practical education for a practical work | October 2814 | October 2814 | defeated | ||
Sex Education Act | October 2814 | October 2814 | passed | ||
Education Reform Act | October 2814 | October 2814 | defeated | ||
Public Safety Act | September 2814 | September 2814 | defeated |
Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |