We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Hosia Demokrata Popola Partio[?]
This page contains information about the Hosia Demokrata Popola Partio.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Augustanoj
Nation[?]: Respubliko de Zardujo (Zardugal)
Seats[?] in Leĝdonaro (Legislature)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ὁσϊα Δεμοκρατα Ποπολα Παρτϊο The Hosian Democratic People's Party is a Hosian Democratic and Monarchist party campaigning for the rebirth of the holy Augustan Imperial Throne, the recognition of the Terran Patriarchal Church as a state religion, and the reexamination of Zardugal's role in Majatran and Terran affairs on a just and equitable basis. |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | high | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | high | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | moderate | perfect |
Foreign Relations | moderate internationalist | moderate | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate big government | high | perfect |
Market | moderate regulator | high | perfect |
Military | pacifist-leaning | moderate | perfect |
Morality | conservative-leaning | high | perfect |
Religion | moderate religious | moderate | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
March 3592 | 9,408,369 | 63,255,169 | 14.87 | +14.87 | 114 | 750 | 15.20 | +114 |
September 3592 | 9,351,977 | 61,596,157 | 15.18 | +0.31 | 114 | 750 | 15.20 | +0 |
September 3597 | 5,445,667 | 61,028,570 | 8.92 | -6.26 | 65 | 750 | 8.67 | -49 |
July 3601 | 11,690,062 | 63,061,005 | 18.54 | +9.61 | 140 | 750 | 18.67 | +75 |
February 3603 | 12,214,162 | 62,444,791 | 19.56 | +1.02 | 148 | 750 | 19.73 | +8 |
August 3606 | 13,344,070 | 51,570,579 | 25.88 | +6.32 | 204 | 750 | 27.20 | +56 |
March 3610 | 8,650,795 | 52,231,016 | 16.56 | -9.31 | 124 | 750 | 16.53 | -80 |
March 3616 | 7,257,380 | 41,126,419 | 17.65 | +1.08 | 134 | 750 | 17.87 | +10 |
March 3622 | 11,232,790 | 47,695,018 | 23.55 | +5.90 | 176 | 750 | 23.47 | +42 |
September 3627 | 24,953,124 | 55,206,819 | 45.20 | +21.65 | 348 | 750 | 46.40 | +172 |
September 3633 | 23,930,282 | 50,625,770 | 47.27 | +2.07 | 365 | 750 | 48.67 | +17 |
December 3635 | 25,115,052 | 49,987,555 | 50.24 | +2.97 | 393 | 750 | 52.40 | +28 |
July 3640 | 25,739,056 | 48,506,642 | 53.06 | +2.82 | 423 | 750 | 56.40 | +30 |
June 3644 | 10,934,380 | 60,921,255 | 17.95 | -35.11 | 141 | 750 | 18.80 | -282 |
January 4037 | 10,106,173 | 64,081,573 | 15.77 | -2.18 | 71 | 465 | 15.27 | -70 |
January 4041 | 19,898,721 | 60,283,368 | 33.01 | +17.24 | 152 | 465 | 32.69 | +81 |
June 4043 | 23,371,829 | 57,903,720 | 40.36 | +7.35 | 187 | 465 | 40.22 | +35 |
June 4047 | 26,447,800 | 58,479,079 | 45.23 | +4.86 | 208 | 465 | 44.73 | +21 |
June 4051 | 28,446,536 | 56,961,344 | 49.94 | +4.71 | 233 | 465 | 50.11 | +25 |
June 4055 | 11,775,716 | 11,775,716 | 100.00 | +50.06 | 465 | 465 | 100.00 | +232 |
June 4059 | 11,758,966 | 11,758,966 | 100.00 | +0.00 | 465 | 465 | 100.00 | +0 |
June 4063 | 16,347,503 | 55,580,251 | 29.41 | -70.59 | 143 | 465 | 30.75 | -322 |
June 4067 | 12,288,214 | 47,023,912 | 26.13 | -3.28 | 125 | 465 | 26.88 | -18 |
June 4071 | 17,411,824 | 54,731,132 | 31.81 | +5.68 | 151 | 465 | 32.47 | +26 |
July 4074 | 14,297,169 | 59,668,944 | 23.96 | -7.85 | 114 | 465 | 24.52 | -37 |
July 4078 | 15,969,135 | 60,921,348 | 26.21 | +2.25 | 123 | 465 | 26.45 | +9 |
July 4082 | 13,151,435 | 55,775,807 | 23.58 | -2.63 | 109 | 465 | 23.44 | -14 |
July 4086 | 11,868,195 | 56,861,900 | 20.87 | -2.71 | 94 | 465 | 20.22 | -15 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Hosia Demokrata Popola Partio.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
CSD Act: Preservation of Zardugal | August 2642 | March 2643 | passed | ||
Bill 009 | May 2642 | May 2642 | defeated | ||
Protect Our People Through Labeling Act (POPTLA) | September 2641 | September 2641 | defeated | ||
Defense Policy Alteration Act | September 2641 | September 2641 | defeated | ||
CSD Act T-E278 | July 2641 | July 2641 | passed | ||
CSD Act: Preparing | July 2641 | July 2641 | passed | ||
Call for early elections, July 2641 | July 2641 | July 2641 | defeated | ||
Religious Restriction Act | July 2641 | July 2641 | defeated | ||
Allowance For More Bills Act of 2461 | February 2641 | February 2641 | defeated | ||
Supporting Industry Act | February 2641 | February 2641 | passed | ||
CSD Act 33 | January 2641 | January 2641 | passed | ||
CSd Act: Defending Zardugal | January 2641 | January 2641 | passed | ||
CSD Bill A-B0016z | January 2641 | January 2641 | passed | ||
Self-ownership Act of 2640 | November 2640 | November 2640 | defeated | ||
Externality Tax Act of 2640 | November 2640 | November 2640 | defeated | ||
Foreign Policy Reform | September 2640 | September 2640 | defeated | ||
Land Mine Act | September 2640 | September 2640 | passed | ||
Justice Reform Act | September 2640 | September 2640 | passed | ||
Right to Privacy Act of 2640 | September 2640 | September 2640 | defeated | ||
Deregulation of the Free Market Act of 2640 | September 2640 | September 2640 | passed |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "I don’t have facts to back this up." - Herman Cain |