We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
The Common Union for Social Progress[?]
This page contains information about the The Common Union for Social Progress.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: lordemusic
Nation[?]: Union of Rildanor (Rildanor)
Seats[?] in Conseil de l'État Rildanorien (Council of the Rildanorian State)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Ecology | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Market | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
June 4354 | 40,300 | 55,514,873 | 0.07 | +0.07 | 0 | 75 | 0.00 | +0 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the The Common Union for Social Progress.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Cabinet Proposal of January 2976 | January 2976 | January 2976 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of November 2975 | November 2975 | November 2975 | passed | ||
9 | May 2975 | May 2975 | passed | ||
8 | March 2973 | March 2973 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of March 2973 | March 2973 | March 2973 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of March 2973 | March 2973 | March 2973 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of March 2973 | March 2973 | March 2973 | passed | ||
7 | February 2971 | February 2971 | passed | ||
6 | March 2970 | March 2970 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of March 2970 | March 2970 | March 2970 | passed | ||
5 | June 2969 | June 2969 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of January 2968 | January 2968 | January 2968 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of January 2968 | January 2968 | January 2968 | passed | ||
4 | January 2968 | January 2968 | passed | ||
3 | January 2968 | January 2968 | passed | ||
2 | May 2967 | May 2967 | passed | ||
1 | September 2965 | September 2965 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of September 2965 | September 2965 | September 2965 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of April 2964 | April 2964 | April 2964 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of February 2964 | February 2964 | February 2964 | passed |
Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |