We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Today80 Party[?]
This page contains information about the Today80 Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: United States of Baltusia (Baltusia)
Seats[?] in Congress of the United States[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Ecology | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Market | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
July 2370 | 31,734 | 55,352,692 | 0.06 | +0.06 | 0 | 200 | 0.00 | +0 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Today80 Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Military Act | February 2952 | May 2952 | passed | ||
Parliamentary Government Act | February 2952 | May 2952 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of February 2952 | February 2952 | February 2952 | defeated | ||
National Parks and Historic Sites Act | February 2952 | February 2952 | passed | ||
Termination of Public Health Care | February 2952 | February 2952 | defeated | ||
Contraception Act | February 2952 | February 2952 | defeated | ||
Abortion Act | February 2952 | February 2952 | defeated | ||
Economic Act | February 2952 | February 2952 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of February 2951 | February 2951 | July 2951 | defeated | ||
Ecology Act | November 2949 | November 2949 | defeated | ||
Legalisation of Pornography | September 2948 | September 2948 | passed | ||
The place of Religion | September 2948 | September 2948 | defeated | ||
Marital Standards Act | February 2948 | February 2948 | defeated | ||
Traditional Marriage Act | February 2948 | February 2948 | defeated | ||
Trading Rights Act | February 2948 | February 2948 | defeated | ||
Public Transport Funding Act | February 2948 | February 2948 | passed | ||
Call for early elections, January 2948 | January 2948 | January 2948 | defeated | ||
Immigration Act | October 2947 | October 2947 | defeated | ||
Liberate the Railways Bill | October 2947 | October 2947 | defeated | ||
National Anthem Recitation Bill | October 2947 | October 2947 | defeated |
Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
Random quote: "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Jean Chretien (describing the level of proof about weapons of mass destruction that Canada required to join the Iraq War) |