We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sports Club Freedom Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Absolutist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2360
Description[?]:
| In order to allow some diversity within sporting, we propose the following article to take effect. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The funding of sports clubs.
Old value:: All sports clubs are government owned and run.
Current: The government does not fund sports clubs; only private ones are allowed.
Proposed: The government funds some sports clubs side-by-side with private ones.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:59:38, February 14, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Party of Ikradon | To | Debating the Sports Club Freedom Act |
| Message | The LPI approves of the legalisation of private sports clubs. |
| Date | 19:40:21, February 14, 2007 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Sports Club Freedom Act |
| Message | The NCP's agrees with the LPI's position. |
| Date | 20:30:46, February 14, 2007 CET | From | Iqembu Sokusebenzisana Yeningi | To | Debating the Sports Club Freedom Act |
| Message | Supported. |
| Date | 18:40:39, February 15, 2007 CET | From | Socialist Workers Union | To | Debating the Sports Club Freedom Act |
| Message | I can see a slow decline in sporting clubs as the private ones spend money they do not have and slowly go bust. |
| Date | 22:43:00, February 15, 2007 CET | From | Absolutist Party | To | Debating the Sports Club Freedom Act |
| Message | The government ones would still be there in that unlikely case. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 500 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 64 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 35 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: Wait a min was we tricked into voting for absolute monarchy (Jamie Jamesson, Chancellor of Luthori 4269-4310) |