We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Separation of HoS and HoG
Details
Submitted by[?]: AM Feminazi Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2362
Description[?]:
| While the LFFR has little or no faith in democracy, we do whoever remain consistent in our desire to separate these positions. We recognise that for most of Likatonia's history these offices have been two seperate identities and this state of affairs has worked well. The LFFR will move this to a vote sometime after the election when the new convoction may take a favourable view of this. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Current: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Proposed: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:19:56, February 17, 2007 CET | From |  Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the Separation of HoS and HoG |
| Message | The LITP feel that by making the Head of State chair the cabinet, it ensures that the party with most popular support can be represented, even against a hostile coalition. |
| Date | 01:42:48, February 18, 2007 CET | From | AM Feminazi Movement | To | Debating the Separation of HoS and HoG |
| Message | Why should there not be a voice of dissent in government ? Surely this will mean that a broader cross-section of the actual vote will be represented, something we assume that 'democrats' and 'liberals' would have wanted. |
| Date | 08:42:47, February 18, 2007 CET | From | AM Populist Social Democrats | To | Debating the Separation of HoS and HoG |
| Message | The people should be able to choose their leader, a sentiment that the LFFR should agree with given that the people came close to choosing their candidate, in an election that shows that people want bigger government. |
| Date | 11:22:35, February 18, 2007 CET | From | AM Feminazi Movement | To | Debating the Separation of HoS and HoG |
| Message | Presumably then, if the people were to choose the LFFR leader in this .. more powerful .. position it would be a concern for the PLPL and something that they should perhaps change their mind on now while we offer to support this notion? Furthermore .. WE are the most popular party and we still could not take the postion - so that makes it hardly representative. Do you really want a Fascist controlling such a prestigious position ? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 118 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 81 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation. |
| Random quote: "The trouble with unemployment is that the minute you wake up in the morning you're on the job." - Slappy White |