Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:28:47
Server time: 20:31:12, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): JourneyKan | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of August 2362

Details

Submitted by[?]: Revolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2363

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:15:17, February 19, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2362
MessageTHis cabinet, or another with the RFP in foreign affairs must pass for the creation of the larger act. We cannot finish constructing the IRNSCPCOARARA without a foreign affairs position.

Date23:18:30, February 19, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party/Church of Kalistan
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2362
Messagethe RFP has foreign affairs in this cabinet. I'm not really that keen on defence, my particular area of interest is foreign affairs.

Date23:20:08, February 19, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party/Church of Kalistan
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2362
MessagePlus, I'll need to discuss this with my main ally, the CLP, before I make a final decision. I am not happy that you've chosen to ride the compromise coat into government, you could've asked for a CPK/CLP/RFP coalition, which I would've supported.

Date00:04:20, February 20, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2362
MessageI need to make a new treaty to create the main act. As such, I need the Foreign Affairs position.

I am uncomfortable with a right wing party in charge of certain positions (Justice, Education, Social Services)

Besides, the TDP Let's Keep the RFP from Making A Cabinet Act has essentially made it where no cabinet lasts long, and the cabinet is in a constat state of utter chaos. (Thanks, TDP, did I tell you taht was going to happen, or what? Was it worth it to spite me?) This is not a cabinet I would have ever proposed under a normal situation. I just need to be able to make a new treaty.

Date03:45:35, February 20, 2007 CET
FromCommunism Wow! Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2362
MessageI don't care what kind of stupid alliances the two of you come up with, you should know better than to short change the majority party.

Date05:25:17, February 20, 2007 CET
FromTomasianDouglasian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2362
MessageDearest RFP,

Let's set the record straight. It was not my bill that put an end to the President's monopoly on Cabinet proposals - it was in fact the SLP's Government Reform Act of 2350. We did support it but we were certainly not alone - it received support from the current parties - SLP, TDP, KKP, (and the CWP in its prior incarnation as the IAA). And you will remember that I had discussed in the prior debates my misgivings on the creation of a virtual figurehead.

So feel persecuted if you must, but this isn't always just about you. By the way, all but one Cabinet since 2350 has lasted at least 3 years.

If this is in furtherance of the Separation of Neveras - say it like it is - it is pandering to a party that wants to break up our country.

NO!

Date06:37:26, February 20, 2007 CET
FromConservative Liberation Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2362
MessageWhat a load of shite! Why do you think a sitting Chancellor with other Cabinet colleagues would support abdicating for the sake of the Sci and Tech position? This is a thinly veiled power-grab and nothing less. If it truly is an attempt at compromise, you've really bollocksed this up.

Date06:53:52, February 20, 2007 CET
FromKalikali Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2362
MessageOur party is the 3rd most likely to vote with you (65%) and yet you give positions to the CPCK, CLP and TDP?

I don't understand your form of coalition.

Date22:54:44, February 20, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party/Church of Kalistan
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2362
MessageI'm 90% certain you don't need the foreign affairs position to propose a treaty, otherwise I would've never been able to propose the ones I have.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 109

no
       

Total Seats: 506

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations.

    Random quote: "Plans to protect air and water, wilderness and wildlife are in fact plans to protect man." - Stewart Udall

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 75