We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: MLP "Medical" Marijuana Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Fasco-Communist Order
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2366
Description[?]:
| "Medical" marijuana is a sham - out with it. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of cannabis for medicinal purposes.
Old value:: Cannabis is legal as a sedative for patients in pain.
Current: Cannabis is legal as a sedative for patients in pain.
Proposed: The medicinal use of cannabis is illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:56:15, February 27, 2007 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the MLP "Medical" Marijuana Act |
| Message | Abstain. |
| Date | 17:20:05, February 27, 2007 CET | From | Popular Socialist Front | To | Debating the MLP "Medical" Marijuana Act |
| Message | I'm voting no. |
| Date | 17:56:35, February 27, 2007 CET | From | National Fasco-Communist Order | To | Debating the MLP "Medical" Marijuana Act |
| Message | Where the hell is the UCA? |
| Date | 20:29:38, February 27, 2007 CET | From | Popular Socialist Front | To | Debating the MLP "Medical" Marijuana Act |
| Message | I dunno, but I'm off to get "medical" marijuana for my er... mate who um... like... broke his head... |
| Date | 23:40:57, February 27, 2007 CET | From | National Fasco-Communist Order | To | Debating the MLP "Medical" Marijuana Act |
| Message | My point exactly. |
| Date | 03:22:38, February 28, 2007 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the MLP "Medical" Marijuana Act |
| Message | Where is the UCA? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 112 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 126 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 363 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "The sun, the moon and the stars would have disappeared long ago had they happened to be within the reach of predatory human hands." - Havelock Ellis |