We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Right to strike
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Libertarian party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2085
Description[?]:
As it stands workers critical to society cannot strike, if this bill passes said workers can strike as long as they put in minimal hours. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The workers' right to strike.
Old value:: All workers, except certain categories of workers regarded as critical to society, have the right to strike.
Current: All workers have the right to strike but certain categories of workers regarded as critical to society have to ensure a minimal service.
Proposed: All workers have the right to strike but certain categories of workers regarded as critical to society have to ensure a minimal service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:52:53, July 23, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Right to strike |
Message | Yep. That's what bus drivers do. Though the Union agreed with the company to do so. It's pretty efficient and orderly. |
Date | 11:20:27, July 23, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the Right to strike |
Message | We whole-heartedly agree with this. |
Date | 12:10:11, July 23, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the Right to strike |
Message | Surely policeman on strike would then only investigate certain things because of only having to ensure minimal service? Would that be safe for the nation? |
Date | 12:40:44, July 23, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the Right to strike |
Message | I do not think that police men would strike under this law. *If* they did, it would be highly unfortunate, but then we would draft in the military police in order to keep society running. |
Date | 19:25:57, July 23, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Right to strike |
Message | We cant agree with this, a police strike would be insanity. |
Date | 21:57:10, July 23, 2005 CET | From | Social Libertarian party | To | Debating the Right to strike |
Message | We have military back-up, you prefer our pigs be exploited? We COULD legalize Marijuana so that they're arresting real criminals. |
Date | 22:04:16, July 23, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Right to strike |
Message | we have a police strike in the netherlands, but still i disagree since well a doctors-strike etc... |
Date | 22:16:08, July 23, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Right to strike |
Message | ohw minimal service! |
Date | 09:08:22, July 24, 2005 CET | From | Social Libertarian party | To | Debating the Right to strike |
Message | Well pay our effing doctors better, christ, if they can't live on their wages then somethings really effed up. |
Date | 12:10:26, July 24, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the Right to strike |
Message | "I do not think that police men would strike under this law. *If* they did, it would be highly unfortunate, but then we would draft in the military police in order to keep society running." They would only have to ensure minimal service under this bill, it was said in the topic in the "Creating the Law" board on the forums. And policmen and firemen etc. only giving minimal service is not a good thing. |
Date | 16:41:26, July 24, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Right to strike |
Message | there is a doctor-srike in the netherlands beceause of reforms in the healthcare system that affect the privacy of the patient. not all strikes are for wages... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 662 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 28 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 60 |
Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats. |
Random quote: Although I understand and respect the intentions behind the gesture, this is not something that is universally understood or appreciated, and it tends to give out a negative impression of our party. ~ Anton Weinreich, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party, pleading with his members to stop burning the national flag |