Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:05:47
Server time: 19:54:12, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: 644 Seats Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2037

Description[?]:

For every 100,000 citizens of Darnussia, there will be one seat in Parliament.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Datenot recorded
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the 644 Seats Act
Messagetoo much for such a small country.

Datenot recorded
FromVuloch Ca Korzia
ToDebating the 644 Seats Act
MessageNot at all, in fact the more seats you have the more democratic the final make up of the house is, and therefore we support this Bill.

Datenot recorded
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the 644 Seats Act
Messagethen why not 750?
644 is such a strange number...

Datenot recorded
FromVuloch Ca Korzia
ToDebating the 644 Seats Act
MessageBecause 644 corresponds with the population, as CP put it there would be one seat "for every 100,000 citizens of Darnussia."

644 actually makes more numerical sense.

Datenot recorded
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the 644 Seats Act
MessageGah, c'mon Communist Party. This is a bill with no strings attached. The country is not small and the people will not be so underrepresented!

Datenot recorded
FromDemocratic Workers Commune
ToDebating the 644 Seats Act
MessageI support this

Datenot recorded
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the 644 Seats Act
MessageWith Communist, we'll have 100% of the seats voting in favor of this bill.

Datenot recorded
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the 644 Seats Act
Messagewell it made sence (but i read it to late). but it passed

Datenot recorded
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the 644 Seats Act
Messagewait, ohw ye it was a constitutional voting thingy, meaning they need 3/4th... i still think 750 is better.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 39

no
 

Total Seats: 46

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

Random quote: As for rape, of course, that is a direct consequence of the capitalist system of oppression. Capitalism relies on fuelling division and resentment to sustain itself, and so it sets men against women, race against race and so on. Men rape women because they are being oppressed by capitalism, so they take it out on women. Under Communism, there will be no rape, because there will be a full and natural harmony and equality between the genders. ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62