We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: 644 Seats Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2037
Description[?]:
For every 100,000 citizens of Darnussia, there will be one seat in Parliament. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 150
Current: 150
Proposed: 644
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | not recorded | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | too much for such a small country. |
Date | not recorded | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | Not at all, in fact the more seats you have the more democratic the final make up of the house is, and therefore we support this Bill. |
Date | not recorded | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | then why not 750? 644 is such a strange number... |
Date | not recorded | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | Because 644 corresponds with the population, as CP put it there would be one seat "for every 100,000 citizens of Darnussia." 644 actually makes more numerical sense. |
Date | not recorded | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | Gah, c'mon Communist Party. This is a bill with no strings attached. The country is not small and the people will not be so underrepresented! |
Date | not recorded | From | Democratic Workers Commune | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | I support this |
Date | not recorded | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | With Communist, we'll have 100% of the seats voting in favor of this bill. |
Date | not recorded | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | well it made sence (but i read it to late). but it passed |
Date | not recorded | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | wait, ohw ye it was a constitutional voting thingy, meaning they need 3/4th... i still think 750 is better. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 39 | |||
no | Total Seats: 46 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
Random quote: "Victory attained by violence is tantamount to a defeat, for it is momentary." - Mahatma Gandhi |