We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: 644 Seats Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2037
Description[?]:
For every 100,000 citizens of Darnussia, there will be one seat in Parliament. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 150
Current: 150
Proposed: 644
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | not recorded | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | too much for such a small country. |
Date | not recorded | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | Not at all, in fact the more seats you have the more democratic the final make up of the house is, and therefore we support this Bill. |
Date | not recorded | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | then why not 750? 644 is such a strange number... |
Date | not recorded | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | Because 644 corresponds with the population, as CP put it there would be one seat "for every 100,000 citizens of Darnussia." 644 actually makes more numerical sense. |
Date | not recorded | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | Gah, c'mon Communist Party. This is a bill with no strings attached. The country is not small and the people will not be so underrepresented! |
Date | not recorded | From | Democratic Workers Commune | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | I support this |
Date | not recorded | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | With Communist, we'll have 100% of the seats voting in favor of this bill. |
Date | not recorded | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | well it made sence (but i read it to late). but it passed |
Date | not recorded | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the 644 Seats Act |
Message | wait, ohw ye it was a constitutional voting thingy, meaning they need 3/4th... i still think 750 is better. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 39 | |||
no | Total Seats: 46 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: As for rape, of course, that is a direct consequence of the capitalist system of oppression. Capitalism relies on fuelling division and resentment to sustain itself, and so it sets men against women, race against race and so on. Men rape women because they are being oppressed by capitalism, so they take it out on women. Under Communism, there will be no rape, because there will be a full and natural harmony and equality between the genders. ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |