We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Police Interrogation Act (2419)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Workers Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2420
Description[?]:
An Act to outlaw torture by the police forces |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of torture for obtaining information.
Old value:: It is at the discretion of the police officer to torture suspects for information.
Current: Torture is never allowed.
Proposed: Torture is never allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:22:25, June 27, 2007 CET | From | United Workers Union | To | Debating the Police Interrogation Act (2419) |
Message | a good bill |
Date | 03:00:59, June 29, 2007 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Police Interrogation Act (2419) |
Message | You are only putting lives at risk |
Date | 03:04:25, June 29, 2007 CET | From | Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Police Interrogation Act (2419) |
Message | Yes, because torture is such a reliable means of extracting information. Right ;) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 376 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 264 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 110 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "I don’t have facts to back this up." - Herman Cain |