Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:35:09
Server time: 18:24:50, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: SLP - Military Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party of Malivia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2423

Description[?]:

The Social Liberal Party proposes the following changes to our military and intelligence agencies.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:21:14, July 03, 2007 CET
FromSupporters of Science in Design (IP)
ToDebating the SLP - Military Reform
MessageOur people desire a strong military - I do not think weakening it is a proper move. Due to the risk of Armageddon, though, we would agree to a bill that just featured Article II, though.

Date03:41:54, July 03, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Party of Malivia
ToDebating the SLP - Military Reform
MessageMandatory military service can only weaken the national army in so far as it would remain as it is now, an army of slaves rather than patriotic and dutiful soldiers. The SLP is for a strong Intelligence agency but not one that has permission to carry out Ťall typesť of covert operations that may bring unnecessary harm upon us.

Date04:06:07, July 03, 2007 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the SLP - Military Reform
MessageThe second is the deal killer for us. A strong nuclear presence is was has kept Malivia at peace for hundreds of years. Our policy has always been a small defensive force paired with many nuclear attack subs deployed around the world. Should we be attacked we devastate the attacker's motherland. Cruel perhaps but as we seek no quarrel with other nations, we feel it justified.

Date13:02:20, July 03, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the SLP - Military Reform
MessageThe Social Democratic Party supports article 1 but not articles 2 and 3.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 16

no
   

Total Seats: 184

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

    Random quote: "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - John Dalberg-Acton

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 70