We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Republic of Malivia's Legislative and Executive Term Sessions
Details
Submitted by[?]: Malivian National Unity Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2430
Description[?]:
| In order to better facilitate our proud citizens needs within our roles confined to the Republic of Malivia, the Malivian National Unity Front finds the current term-limits unacceptable. The people of Malivia should expect more out of the Jawatankuasa and it would tie us more closely to their needs in a more timely fashion. As it stands the Jawatankuasa's term-limits is set at 72 months. We've the option to go lower only and as low as 24 months. I am open to suggestions from my fellow parties on this issue. I think it should be easily agreed that a quicker turnaround for elections for both the legislation and executive terms of office is in order. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:48:10, July 16, 2007 CET | From | Malivian National Unity Front | To | Debating the Republic of Malivia's Legislative and Executive Term Sessions |
| Message | Greetings, Given the recent constitional changes which appear to be on it's way to being passed, I thought it fitting to go ahead and once more push forward this piece of legislation. |
| Date | 17:49:34, July 16, 2007 CET | From | Malivian National Unity Front | To | Debating the Republic of Malivia's Legislative and Executive Term Sessions |
| Message | Ignore this measure, I made a mistake folks! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 45 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 155 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "You don't have to explain something you never said." - Calvin Coolidge |