Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 02:26:16
Server time: 01:33:43, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Strength in Unity

Details

Submitted by[?]: Union Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2435

Description[?]:

It has come to the attention of the Party that our current military stance, while adequate, can be changed with the adoption of better options that present to Terra the nature and feelings of the people of the Confederation.

Given the predisposition of the people towards isolationism (55%), we of the DLP feel that the national intelligence policy should concentrate solely on the protection of ourselves directly. We propose that the intelligence service not bow to the pressure of an aggressor by imposing our wills upon other nations.

What better way for the young people of the Confederation, to truly foster unity and strength (as our motto goes) than for them to serve their nation in some capacity or another. This not only helps serve the nation and strengthens it, this act would allow for future leaders to gain experience while serving others. We propose that the young of the nation, upon completion of school, engage in mandatory service to the nation either through the military or another government sponsored and sanctioned activity.

To truly unify the nation both physically and spiritually, women must be given the opportunity to serve the nation alongside men in in complete equality.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:53:29, July 22, 2007 CET
FromUnion Pour une Nation Homosexuelle
ToDebating the Strength in Unity
MessageAlthough we have no objection to article 3, the others are objectinable, and as such we would vote against. but we are likley to support the third article proposed alone

Date03:28:33, July 23, 2007 CET
FromPartie Patriotique de Kanjor
ToDebating the Strength in Unity
MessageWe are against all of these. Our intelligence service, while it does not routinely operate in other countries should have the capacity to do so if need arises. We see no need for routine conscription in times of peace

Date03:36:49, July 23, 2007 CET
FromPartie Patriotique de Kanjor
ToDebating the Strength in Unity
MessageAs for article 3 the current policy does enable women to serve the nation in complete equality as men also serve in segregated units.

Date05:33:59, July 23, 2007 CET
FromUnion Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD)
ToDebating the Strength in Unity
MessageWhy would our intelligence agency need to operate within another soverign nation? The country still apparently has a nuclear deterent, much to our dismay, but yet needs to enter another country when threatened? I fail to see the point.

Are we to be an oppressor nation? Conjolling others to our will? Or are we to be a nation that leads by example?

For what reason would the Confederation have to meddle in the internal affairs of another????

An equality of oppression? We believe women should be able to serve in their units right alongside men in any capacity. Why waste time and energy segregating units and ensuring their separation?

Men and women work alongside eachother in the workspace, but not in the army? The armed forces are not a college dormitory!

As for the National Service proposal; the DLP feels it is imperative for the young to participate in government. This builds a unified nation through common experience, leadership opportunities and a sort of on-the-job training. For those who do not wish to engage in military activities, there are other civilian opportunities available to them.

Date04:44:23, July 25, 2007 CET
FromNouveau Jacobins
ToDebating the Strength in Unity
MessageTake out 1 and 2, and we'll support

Date05:18:33, July 25, 2007 CET
FromUnion Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD)
ToDebating the Strength in Unity
MessageArticle 2 is strongly supported by the DLP. The Party strongly supports and respects the PDC but we will have to maintain these stances. The impotence we have in government is not lost on us but we must insist on keeping our support for the bill regardless of its defeat.

Date12:07:36, July 26, 2007 CET
FromUnion Pour une Nation Homosexuelle
ToDebating the Strength in Unity
MessageThere should be no mandatory national service; period

Date18:54:57, July 27, 2007 CET
FromUnion Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD)
ToDebating the Strength in Unity
MessageWhy not?

Date19:24:03, July 27, 2007 CET
FromUnion Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD)
ToDebating the Strength in Unity
Message(Oops, the DLP didn't quite mean to send this to vote yet, but since it is out there, I guess we can all vote on it.)

Date19:33:47, July 27, 2007 CET
FromPartie Patriotique de Kanjor
ToDebating the Strength in Unity
MessageIn spite of grave misgivings over article 3, we will support.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 269

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 106


    Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden.

    Random quote: "Communism: liberation of the people from the burdens of liberty." - Rick Bayan

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 76