We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Security Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2448
Description[?]:
| x |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Travel by nationals to foreign nations
Old value:: The nation issues passports on demand for any reason to its nationals
Current: The nation issues passports to nationals after an invasive security check.
Proposed: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: Citizens are not issued with identity cards.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting nationality (national of this state without implication of having citizenship rights).
Old value:: Anyone is able to claim nationality.
Current: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Proposed: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:24:38, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Security Bill |
| Message | I completely disagree with the first article, the second article I am still making my mind up on, and the third article is definately a step in the right direction. |
| Date | 16:25:15, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Security Bill |
| Message | I will vote yes, just because of the 3rd article. |
| Date | 19:07:45, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Security Bill |
| Message | Article 1 is only a cursory security check which will mean any criminals or rapists etc who might be thinking of fleeing the country can't simply get a passport and leave |
| Date | 22:20:52, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Cosa Nostra | To | Debating the Security Bill |
| Message | Always thinking of the worst case scenarios... tss, tss, tss. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 217 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 338 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
| Random quote: "And I said on my program, if, if the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush Administration again." - Bill O'Reilly |