Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5575
Next month in: 00:10:27
Server time: 19:49:32, November 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): GLNBei | Moderation | SocDemDundorfian | ZardicFlip | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: "Big Three" Cabinet Proposal of July 2459

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Strength Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2460

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:15:08, September 22, 2007 CET
From Fianna Fail Parliamentary Party
ToDebating the "Big Three" Cabinet Proposal of July 2459
MessageThat is the most ridiculous government proposal I've ever seen to be honest... Its just a desperate attempt to get into government.. Because you know that the likelihood is that you won't.. Three completely different parties.. It won't work...

On a separate note.. I think parties that aren't in the top two(Including mine) shouldn't even suggest cabinet proposals.. It should be left to the top 2.. Let them negotiate it rather than this pathetic attempt to get a few cabinet positions!

Date20:36:12, September 22, 2007 CET
From National Strength Party
ToDebating the "Big Three" Cabinet Proposal of July 2459
MessageI think somebody is just pissed off because they were left out ;)
As for your meaningless acusations, keep them to yourself, we have more important things to discuss than the whinings of some new politicians.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 78

no
    

Total Seats: 245

abstain
   

Total Seats: 177


Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

Random quote: "There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed." - Mahatma Gandhi

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 53