We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Further Enviromental Protection
Details
Submitted by[?]: Endralon Confederates Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2460
Description[?]:
| The environment is a sacred gift to mankind by a divine creator and should be respected and protected. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government provides pollution prevention guidelines, but does not enforce them.
Current: The government provides pollution prevention guidelines, but does not enforce them.
Proposed: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: Waste disposal is left entirely to the private sector but is regulated.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: It is the responsibility of local governments to decide on waste disposal regulation.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Current: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Proposed: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:09:35, September 23, 2007 CET | From |  Social Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Further Enviromental Protection |
| Message | 1. is okay, but why do we need 2. and 3. when we already national regulation on this? |
| Date | 15:42:15, September 23, 2007 CET | From | Fianna Fail Parliamentary Party | To | Debating the Further Enviromental Protection |
| Message | 1 is only after being passed the way it is and its fine... And 2 and 3 there isn't any need for change... |
| Date | 21:12:14, September 23, 2007 CET | From | Endralon Confederates Party | To | Debating the Further Enviromental Protection |
| Message | With articles 2 and 3 I just don't think the feds should be involved, it should be up to the people and their local, more direct governments, they know whats better for them and their community more than some far off parliament. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 78 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 368 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 54 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "Let's not forget that we belong to history, that history that men and women who fought before did, that history that men and women who are fighting now will do." - Tera Pisthis, former Selucian politician |