We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: [Ratify] Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social-Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2098
Description[?]:
| Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic The Government of the Federated States of Rutania and the Government of the Beluzian Republic, desirous of strengthening the cause of peace and cooperation between Rutania and Beluzia, have agreed as follows: Article 1 Both signatory nations shall refrain from any act of violence, any aggressive action, and any attack on each other, either individually or jointly with other powers. Article 2 Should one of the signatory nations become the object of belligerent action by a third power, the other signatory nation shall in no manner lend its support to this third power. Article 3 The Governments of the two signatory nations shall consult together and exchange information on problems affecting their common interests. Article 4 Neither of the two signatory nations shall participate in any grouping of powers whatsoever that is directly or indirectly aimed at the other party. Article 5 Should disputes or conflicts arise between the signatory nations over problems of one kind or another, both parties shall settle these disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that peace and security are not endangered. Article 6 After the present treaty has been in force for twenty years, either signatory nation may terminate the present treaty by a notice of termination given to the Government of the other signatory nations . Termination shall take effect not less than two years after a notice of termination has been given. Article 7 The present treaty shall be presented for ratification by the Governments of the signatory nations to their respective Legislatures within the shortest possible time. Each signatory nation shall notify the other of the outcome of the ratification vote. The agreement shall enter into force as soon as it is ratified by both signatory nations . Hans van Mierlo Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Beluzian Republic Bruce Dickinson Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Federated States of Rutania |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:06:04, August 17, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the [Ratify] Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic |
| Message | In the interest of maintaining peace, and in light of recent tensions, I would suggest that this Parliament ratify the Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic with due haste. The Foreign MInistry is aware that some parties in Beluzia have been pushing for a mutual defence treaty, however we feel that to have a non-agression treaty now would serve to provide some stability, and maneuvering room for future alliances. In the light of the Artania Defense Initiative such cooperation becomes viable. If there are no further comments from this House I shall endeavour to bring the treaty to vote for immediate ratification. |
| Date | 01:20:45, August 18, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the [Ratify] Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic |
| Message | You might want to nudge Rutania into posting it for ratification as well. |
| Date | 07:46:59, August 18, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the [Ratify] Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic |
| Message | I can assure the Rt. Hon. member that such nudging is being done. |
| Date | 10:16:48, August 18, 2005 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the [Ratify] Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic |
| Message | This is a good thing. |
| Date | 11:18:47, August 18, 2005 CET | From |  Freedom Party | To | Debating the [Ratify] Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic |
| Message | Change High Contracting Party to Signatory nation. Article 3 is probably unnecessary. Bruce Dickinson of the Freedom Party as Foreign Minister will be signing this for Rutania You might want to change "Hans van Mierlo Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Federated States of Rutania" to the Beluzian Republic |
| Date | 01:34:12, August 19, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the [Ratify] Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic |
| Message | :D |
| Date | 14:21:15, August 19, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the [Ratify] Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic |
| Message | We would like to keep article 3. |
| Date | 14:46:02, August 19, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the [Ratify] Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic |
| Message | Thats fine then. We can keep article 3 in. |
| Date | 17:58:40, August 19, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the [Ratify] Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic |
| Message | Then I shall bring this to vote for immediate ratification on the part of Beluzia. |
| Date | 17:07:52, August 20, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the [Ratify] Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic |
| Message | Why does the Official Dragon Bacon-Eaters' Party oppose this treaty? |
| Date | 22:59:31, August 20, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the [Ratify] Treaty of Non-aggression Between the Federated States of Rutania and the Beluzian Republic |
| Message | Because peace is not in their interests. Probably why their allies in the PAL started this incident in the first place, and voted agaisnt a non aggression treaty before this incident even occured. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 153 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 106 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
| Random quote: "God creates men, but they choose each other." - Niccolo Machiavelli |