Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 01:10:16
Server time: 06:49:43, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Restoration of Democracy

Details

Submitted by[?]: Workers Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2462

Description[?]:

The Workers Party proposes the revocation of the recently imposed anti-democratic legislation.

Sen. Ersebet Piantella - Leader, Workers Party

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:19:36, September 26, 2007 CET
From New World Order Party
ToDebating the Restoration of Democracy
Messagesure... not. watch out! the workers party might just break this down to separate articles and steal all your ideas. re-introduce them separately for better chances.

Date21:20:12, September 26, 2007 CET
From New World Order Party
ToDebating the Restoration of Democracy
Messageohh wait... you know all about that.

Date22:42:42, September 26, 2007 CET
From New Centre and Unionists
ToDebating the Restoration of Democracy
MessageWas their a purpose to the incoherent babblings of the NWO?

-Mme.Elodie Western-Parker; Party Leader.

Date23:15:52, September 26, 2007 CET
From Workers Party
ToDebating the Restoration of Democracy
MessageOOC: This is a game, buddy. In a game, when you make a wrong move, your opponent may make the right one, and win. As long as it does not violate the rules.

Date05:40:06, September 27, 2007 CET
From Liberal Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Restoration of Democracy
MessageArticles 1, 3 and 5 are supported. The bill in its current state will not be supported by the Liberal Party, present these seperately however and we will support.

Heath Baines, Senate Warden

Date06:22:47, September 27, 2007 CET
From Workers Party
ToDebating the Restoration of Democracy
MessageAll right... we have withdrawn articles 2, 4, and 6. We hope now this bill can get the support of a Senate majority.

Sen. Ersebet Piantella - Leader, Workers Party

Date08:29:21, September 27, 2007 CET
From New Centre and Unionists
ToDebating the Restoration of Democracy
MessageThe MCM is highly Pro-Intelligence, We therfore cannot value this entire legislation as long as Article 2 is in existance.

-Mme.Anna Rochelle- Deputy Party Leader.

Date17:08:28, September 27, 2007 CET
From Labour Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Restoration of Democracy
MessageI am sorry but we cannot back this on the grounds that we don't agree with Article 2.

Alistair Marriot, Labour Party Leader

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 150

no
      

Total Seats: 275

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification.

    Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 79