Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5477
Next month in: 01:19:22
Server time: 22:40:37, May 01, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): hexaus18 | LC73DunMHP | PortCrab | Sam678 | TaMan443 | Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of December 2462

Details

Submitted by[?]: Real Labour Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2464

Description[?]:

"A government is not a company. It is not our job to deliever a profit each year. We collect taxes for spending not for running a surplus. This bill addresses the crazy situation that currently exists"

- Dr. Gavin Kleen, Finance Minister

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:13:03, September 29, 2007 CET
From Christian Democrats
ToDebating the Budget proposal of December 2462
Message"The surplus does serve to restore the massive trust fund that operated before the Labor Party squandered it by selling our country to foreigners. . . but, except for cuts in Trade and Industry, and dramatic cuts in Defense, this is not a bad budget. I think, if Finance is not cut so badly, we may support this. Keymon is a financial capital of the world."

-- Kenner Giles

Date00:00:06, September 30, 2007 CET
From Real Labour Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of December 2462
Message"If we were to increase (from the proposed) finance spending to 35 million, decreased Internal affairs by 5 million, decreased education by 15 million and infrastructure and transport by 10 million would the Christian Nationalists support?"

- Dr. Gavin Kleen, Finance Minister

Date00:48:27, September 30, 2007 CET
From Christian Democrats
ToDebating the Budget proposal of December 2462
Message"End the cuts to internal affairs (which covers law enforcement) and yes. If you wish to preserve this discussion, we would be willing to vote in favor of this budget and then vote in favor of the next budget, provided the next budget corrected the problems we identified."

-- Kenner Giles

Date12:14:36, September 30, 2007 CET
From Democratic Republican Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of December 2462
Message"The DRP can support an increase of the budget by 30 million. Money isn't just magically conjured; that is why the state must turn a profit."

DRP Leader
Christopher Schultz

Date14:07:36, September 30, 2007 CET
From Real Labour Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of December 2462
Message"The "cut" to internal affairs is only a cut to the proposed budget for internal affairs. In other words internal affairs would remain at 10 million rather than increasing to 15 million. We are happy to take up the Christian National's offer"

- Dr. Gavin Kleen, Finance Minister

Date16:31:11, September 30, 2007 CET
From Christian Democrats
ToDebating the Budget proposal of December 2462
Message"I see. Proceed, Minister Kleen."

-- Kenner Giles

Date18:21:58, October 01, 2007 CET
From Christian Democrats
ToDebating the Budget proposal of December 2462
Message"I trust the new Director General is aware that the budget passes because of support from the opposition."

-- Kenner Giles

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 79

no
  

Total Seats: 33

abstain
  

Total Seats: 7


Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification.

Random quote: The U.N. is a place where governments opposed to free speech demand to be heard. - MAD Magazine

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56