Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:35:14
Server time: 18:24:45, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: A Country of Peace

Details

Submitted by[?]: Parti Justice Populiste

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2467

Description[?]:

If we are to continue to lead the world in our excellence in prowess, we must change the way we view the world.
We can no longer refuse aid to those among us who are suffering.
We can no longer bar entry to those seeking asylum in our borders.
We must show the world that we, indeed, are a large part of it.
We need show that we care.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:09:21, October 08, 2007 CET
FromGolden Age Party
ToDebating the A Country of Peace
MessageArticle 2 is a really bad idea! You want to let refugees in, but don't give them financial aid? Most of the time, these people have no money. This will result in a big increase of crime!

Date14:33:15, October 08, 2007 CET
FromHouse Party
ToDebating the A Country of Peace
MessageMuch better than the current situation but not enough. Too bad no one else would agree

Date16:38:21, October 08, 2007 CET
FromPro Patria
ToDebating the A Country of Peace
MessageWe - Spes Patriae - believe these articles are fine as they are, and so does the Imperial Senate as the current articles were passed not too long ago.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 148

no
      

Total Seats: 322

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility.

    Random quote: "Democracy is in peril." - Ralph Nader (referring to turnout in the 1996 US presidential election)

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59