Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5475
Next month in: 01:18:06
Server time: 02:41:53, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Adoption Deregulation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2483

Description[?]:

This act will allow local governments to decide on Adoption Policies

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:00:26, November 06, 2007 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Adoption Deregulation Act
MessageThis is not a local issue. A couple from one tribe may adopt a child from another. We can't allow even the possibility of tribes competing against each other on issues of adoption, for the children will be the ones worse off.

Date00:23:43, November 06, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Adoption Deregulation Act
MessageSays the person who wants to ruin the environment.

Date01:07:20, November 06, 2007 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Adoption Deregulation Act
MessageWe'll think about it

Date06:22:08, November 06, 2007 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Adoption Deregulation Act
MessageWe don't want to ruin the environment. There is a balance between the environment and the economy.

Date11:03:58, November 06, 2007 CET
FromFlemish Liberation Front
ToDebating the Adoption Deregulation Act
Messagewe do not support

Date15:09:25, November 06, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Adoption Deregulation Act
MessageSo this is a national issue but the environment is a local issue? Boy I am sure glad you clarified that up. *rolls eyes*

Date22:54:50, November 06, 2007 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Adoption Deregulation Act
MessageThat's exactly our stance. Matters of land and environment are local because they have no national effect.

Date00:17:32, November 07, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Adoption Deregulation Act
MessageWhich is incorrect.

Date05:36:42, November 07, 2007 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Adoption Deregulation Act
MessageYou are entitled to your opinion.

Date16:20:30, November 07, 2007 CET
FromFlemish Liberation Front
ToDebating the Adoption Deregulation Act
Messageno... you are not... and neither is JUP...
soon i'll enslave you both!

Date17:45:12, November 07, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Adoption Deregulation Act
MessageGrow up.

Date20:15:49, November 07, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Adoption Deregulation Act
MessageFailed

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
     

Total Seats: 499

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workers of all countries: unite!" - Karl Marx

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68