Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 02:57:40
Server time: 17:02:19, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): ADM Drax | Autokrator30 | HopesFor | Klexi | Mbites2 | Ost | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Museums and adoption

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2482

Description[?]:

We the democratic party move for the following reforms

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:17:00, November 06, 2007 CET
From Liberty Party
ToDebating the Museums and adoption
MessageOOC: For multiple propsal bills with no specific connection, I just do it in this format, more simple, easier for discussion.

" Article 1: It's really not like someone's going to start an agency called "Kids for Pedos". This bill allows the State to grant "permits" to agency's that strive to put a kid in a home with a parent. To say that they can't be raised by a single individual is ludicrous, if we believed in that we'd put kids into foster homes if one of their parents died. To say that homosexual's are not capable of raising children is not true, as they are people, no matter what their sexual orientation. That's like saying black people can't raise children. Party's who think that homosexual parents means homosexual children is also wrong, as homosexuals tend to have straight parents. Sexuality cannot be influenced by another person, no matter what they mean to the gay. Just ask any Christian fundamentalist whose kid's just came out of the closet.

Article 2: Zardugal has a rich culture and history. It has inspired many history buffs who'd love to establish a museum. Of course, if they started to fail, their government funds would be cut. If they no longer needed them, the funds would be cut.

This bill allows us to get the benefits of the free market without the risk of losing our historic and cultural wonders."

~LP Spokesman


Date16:11:04, November 06, 2007 CET
From National Authoritarian Movement
ToDebating the Museums and adoption
MessageNo, because the effects of the funding cannot be controled.
Furthermore, we cannot accept the trade of humans through "adoption companies".

Date20:12:59, November 06, 2007 CET
From Irish Party
ToDebating the Museums and adoption
MessageI am indifferent to article 1. I am against article 2. I agree that these organisations will obviously be well intended, however I don't think anyone except the state should be given premission to 'trade' citizens.

Date09:19:38, November 07, 2007 CET
From Liberty Party
ToDebating the Museums and adoption
Message"I don't understand. Companies? These are organizations that look after children and try to put them in a home. How can you be so heartless as to not allow them to do this?"

~LP Spokesman

Date20:51:35, November 07, 2007 CET
From Revolutionary Army Left Movement
ToDebating the Museums and adoption
MessageAs simply as it is:

NO
NO

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 137

no
     

Total Seats: 264

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification.

    Random quote: "It is double pleasure to deceive the deceiver." - Niccolo Machiavelli

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 66