Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:33:42
Server time: 20:26:17, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): JourneyKan | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Warfare (Nuclear Weapons) Amendment Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2486

Description[?]:

An act to change policy with regard to nuclear weapons.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:36:52, November 12, 2007 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Warfare (Nuclear Weapons) Amendment Act
MessageWe shouldn't use nuclear weapons offensively. They serve their purposes best as a deterrent.

Date14:32:39, November 12, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Warfare (Nuclear Weapons) Amendment Act
MessageHey, an idea we can 100% support

Date12:51:52, November 13, 2007 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Warfare (Nuclear Weapons) Amendment Act
MessagePerhaps

Date12:26:55, November 14, 2007 CET
FromFlemish Liberation Front
ToDebating the Warfare (Nuclear Weapons) Amendment Act
Messagenope

Date21:43:15, November 14, 2007 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Warfare (Nuclear Weapons) Amendment Act
MessageFailed

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 244

no
    

Total Seats: 255

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated.

    Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 61