Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 02:23:22
Server time: 05:36:37, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Greater Cabinet Proposal of June 2486

Details

Submitted by[?]: Loyalistische Partei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2487

Description[?]:

RWA deserves more important responsibilites.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:09:50, November 15, 2007 CET
FromLoyalistische Partei
ToDebating the The Greater Cabinet Proposal of June 2486
MessageRWA deserves more important responsibilites.

Date14:19:58, November 15, 2007 CET
FromLoyalistische Partei
ToDebating the The Greater Cabinet Proposal of June 2486
MessageNah, screw this proposal, not enough seats, missing one.

Date14:21:38, November 15, 2007 CET
FromNeoliberal Party
ToDebating the The Greater Cabinet Proposal of June 2486
MessageSorry, fellow Finn, but I have to keep my word. Besides I'm closer to the Patriots than to the socialist parties.

Date14:23:29, November 15, 2007 CET
FromLoyalistische Partei
ToDebating the The Greater Cabinet Proposal of June 2486
MessageUNC has never been socialist. And beware, Patriots are not too keen on keeping their word, atleast in the past.

Date14:29:18, November 15, 2007 CET
FromNeoliberal Party
ToDebating the The Greater Cabinet Proposal of June 2486
MessageI ment the two other parties.

Date17:12:45, November 15, 2007 CET
FromJewish-Christian Alliance of Patriots
ToDebating the The Greater Cabinet Proposal of June 2486
MessageI always keep my word. I talked to RWA about cabinet, and we have a deal.

Date00:42:50, November 16, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the The Greater Cabinet Proposal of June 2486
MessageWhat word have we given that we didn't keep? And we'll never ally ourselves with fascists or allow the conservatives to control finances of the country.

Date10:10:54, November 16, 2007 CET
FromDarnussian Liberal Democrat Party
ToDebating the The Greater Cabinet Proposal of June 2486
MessageIs that the same type of deal we had before you betrayed my trust?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 26

no
    

Total Seats: 224

abstain
    

Total Seats: 50


Random fact: Party organizations are eligible for deletion if they are over 50 in-game years old, do not have at least 1 active member or are historically significant and possess historically significant information.

Random quote: "He comes out of hibernation once every three years and says something stupid. No wonder the UR fell apart." - Tirza Sommer, Pragmatic Party Leader, on the Dorvish President, Leonhard Khan.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64