Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 02:56:24
Server time: 05:03:35, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: anti-fascist bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Libertarian party of Darnussia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2101

Description[?]:

http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=15282

As this bill of the so called national socialist party shows, fascists are getting a threath throughout the world! To prevent fascists from rising to power in the Great Republic of Darnussia i Jorian Jumelet of the Communist party of Darnussia propose to make fascism and fascist practises (including nazism) illegal. I believe such bill needs a 2/3th majority so i hope you will all recognize this fascist threath.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:51:38, August 24, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the anti-fascist bill
MessageWe should not make them illegal, that will only drive them underground and make them even more dangerous.

The best way forward is too destory them with the power and superiority of our debate and idealogies, the idealogy of fascism is weak and can easily have holes made in it.

Besides We, the SDP, believe in free speech

Date21:33:12, August 24, 2005 CET
FromVuloch Ca Korzia
ToDebating the anti-fascist bill
MessageNo. I am sorry dear friend, but democracy is unconditional. As much as it pains me, I must vote against this Bill.

Date22:45:36, August 24, 2005 CET
FromSocial Libertarian party
ToDebating the anti-fascist bill
Messageindeed, I must as well.

Date12:25:39, August 25, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the anti-fascist bill
Messageit's hate speech, they're message wouldn't be allowed on our TV anyhow so that would be undemocratic...

Date12:26:12, August 25, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the anti-fascist bill
MessageBut hey if you want to destroy our democracy by allowing them to destroy it... dont say i didn't warn you...

Date13:43:24, August 25, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the anti-fascist bill
MessageOOC: history's repeating... last time fascists rose to power only communists opposed them...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 14

no
      

Total Seats: 166

abstain
 

Total Seats: 20


Random fact: Cultural Protocol bills must provide a real-life equivalent or short description for the ethnic groups, languages and religions contained in them, such that it would be easy for an unfamiliar player to understand (e.g. "Dundorfian = German"). Where appropriate, they should also provide guidance to players on where to find help with translations and character names. This might include, for example, links to Google Translate, Behind the Name's Random Name Generator and Fantasy Name Generators.

Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57