We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Post Office Nationalization
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2491
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are unregulated.
Current: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are unregulated.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:27:20, November 25, 2007 CET | From | Deists of Darnussia | To | Debating the Post Office Nationalization |
| Message | Oh, thank Buddha, maybe now my tax forms will arrive on time! |
| Date | 09:10:23, November 25, 2007 CET | From | Neoliberal Party | To | Debating the Post Office Nationalization |
| Message | I pay my post, you pay your post. Simple. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 226 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 74 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "In this age, the man who dares to think for himself and to act independently does a service to his race" - John Stuart Mill |