We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sales Tax Reduction Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2495
Description[?]:
| The new National Conservative Party is moving that Sales Tax on luxury items to be reduced from 50% to 25%. This comes hand in hand with our current policies of Welfare Reform and Workforce Participation. Should these bills be passed - we will then move for this to be voted on. The people of this great nation need to be rewarded for their hard work. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Sales tax on luxury goods.
Old value:: 50
Current: 10
Proposed: 25
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:03:34, November 27, 2007 CET | From | Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | I would prefer an even lower rate (10-15%), but will support this much needed tax relief. |
| Date | 10:43:54, November 28, 2007 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | Look we are willing to negotiate on both sides the spectrum - we say down to 25% to have a happy medium - im holding off until our previous motions are passed - if we are to lower this we are to ensure adequate resources are available. |
| Date | 18:03:49, November 28, 2007 CET | From | Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | We will support any decrease in this insane tax! |
| Date | 18:33:57, November 28, 2007 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | This is luxury tax, not sales tax. We have all the luxuries we need, w no relief in sight. Try eating oats instead of foie gras, you overstuffed oxen! |
| Date | 02:26:21, November 29, 2007 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | Reducing this tax is not about need - it is about rewarding those hard working taxpayers, for too long they have been under the pressure by socialist policies that see their money dissapear into the states coffers. Dont you think we should reward people? |
| Date | 06:31:28, November 29, 2007 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | absolutely! We should reward them with a stronger military! |
| Date | 17:06:35, November 29, 2007 CET | From | Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | This is a tax on the sale proceeds of goods, therefore it is a sales tax. |
| Date | 19:42:15, November 29, 2007 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | '''Luxury''' goods. NOT necessities (like bullets and rations). |
| Date | 02:38:39, December 02, 2007 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | It may be a luxury good - but people deserve luxuries from time to time - otherwise what is the point in working hard contributing to society via taxes. The National Conservative Party believes that the people of this great nation have worked extremely hard to bring about a decent economy therefore it is our responsibility and legislators to ensure we keep this up by rewarding the people this luxury. |
| Date | 03:38:42, December 02, 2007 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | You have to understand, I oppose income tax. We have to get $ from somewhere tho, so why not discourages vices like diamonds and liquor? |
| Date | 07:30:42, December 02, 2007 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | i oppose income tax as well - however policies in which I have put forward previously in which members of this place opposed (Workforce Participation and Welfare Reform) would have helped considerably in this situation. Nevertheless I believe our economy is in a stable state to reduce the luxury tax. I would be happy for it to be reduced until after the next election. And you will have my guarantee that I will support any move to increase it. Give the people of this nation a break!!! |
| Date | 20:30:26, December 02, 2007 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | As a gesture of goodwill towards the NCP, the People will support this temporary reduction. |
| Date | 04:29:21, December 03, 2007 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Sales Tax Reduction Act |
| Message | Thank you. May the electorate reward you!!! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 446 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 142 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 162 |
| Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats. |
| Random quote: "I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born." - Ronald Reagan, quoted in New York Times, 22 September 1980 |