We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economic Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Royalist Party of Islam
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2493
Description[?]:
| An attempt to iron out a few remaining problems in our economic legislation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Proposed: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government agricultural and farming subsidies policy.
Old value:: The government denies subsidy assistance to farmers.
Current: The government subsidises agriculture based on market demand for the crop being grown.
Proposed: The government subsidises agriculture based on market demand for the crop being grown.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: The government does not intervene in the market nor provide any form of subsidies/relief to industries.
Current: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Proposed: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:36:55, November 28, 2007 CET | From | Royalist Party of Islam | To | Debating the Economic Reform |
| Message | So... any opinions? |
| Date | 03:01:08, November 28, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Economic Reform |
| Message | Better than what we have now. Could be better. |
| Date | 04:40:51, November 28, 2007 CET | From | Royalist Party of Islam | To | Debating the Economic Reform |
| Message | Heh, I want to find a sort of balance between corporate police state and communist revolution. |
| Date | 05:05:53, November 28, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Economic Reform |
| Message | We wish the following to remain as it is: Current: The government does not intervene in the market nor provide any form of subsidies/relief to industries. Proposed: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services. |
| Date | 05:22:25, November 28, 2007 CET | From | Royalist Party of Islam | To | Debating the Economic Reform |
| Message | Sometimes, a bit of intervention is necessary if the industry is failing to support itself. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 399 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 116 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed. |
| Random quote: "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson |