We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: In preparation for...
Details
Submitted by[?]: Official Dragon Bacon-Eaters' Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2104
Description[?]:
War with Rutania - if it may occur - we, the Official Dragon Bacon-Eaters' Party propose serious changes to our military. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Nation's policy with regards to an intelligence agency.
Old value:: The nation has an intelligence agency, but it is limited to counter-intelligence and surveillance of other countries.
Current: The nation has an intelligence agency, but it is limited to counter-intelligence and surveillance of other countries.
Proposed: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:57:56, August 28, 2005 CET | From | Official Dragon Bacon-Eaters' Party | To | Debating the In preparation for... |
Message | We proposed the changes to chemical weapons and nukes due to one fatal flaw in the reasoning of the current laws... that we may ONLY use them if another nation uses them first. These amendments were added so that if, in case, we learn that another nation has intention to use them that we can use them first. Debate shall begin now. |
Date | 01:52:08, August 29, 2005 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the In preparation for... |
Message | Opposed on all counts. |
Date | 12:42:40, August 29, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the In preparation for... |
Message | The Ruts are talking about having the same type of intelligence agency. |
Date | 15:06:49, August 29, 2005 CET | From | Official Dragon Bacon-Eaters' Party | To | Debating the In preparation for... |
Message | Any reason you oppose, Tax and Spend? |
Date | 02:03:08, August 30, 2005 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the In preparation for... |
Message | Yes, because I don't support any of them. |
Date | 11:30:04, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Official Dragon Bacon-Eaters' Party | To | Debating the In preparation for... |
Message | Any logical reasons, then? |
Date | 20:58:33, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the In preparation for... |
Message | Opposed. Although article three is interesting. As for article two we would prefer defence industries to be owned by the state As for explanation, we're a pacifist party and do not and cannot agree to allowing for the development of nuclear and/or bio-technology. These weapons do not just affect single targets for a short time but affect many for a very long time. |
Date | 20:59:42, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the In preparation for... |
Message | So basically, you're never going to get our support on articles one and four. Article three we find interesting. Article two you'd have to persuade us very well. But as stands this bill will not get our support. |
Date | 03:11:24, August 31, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the In preparation for... |
Message | I am in favour of this act, we MUST be prepared to defend the citizens of this great nation! |
Date | 18:55:42, August 31, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the In preparation for... |
Message | I oppose on the grounds of articles 2 and 3 |
Date | 16:41:45, September 01, 2005 CET | From | Official Dragon Bacon-Eaters' Party | To | Debating the In preparation for... |
Message | If the PPP and Conservatives would actually VOTE on this... >.> |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 103 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 233 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 64 |
Random fact: If you want to know how many players there are in Particracy right now, check out the Game Statistics buried at the bottom of the World Map screen. |
Random quote: "One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." - Thomas B. Reed |