Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5480
Next month in: 00:15:55
Server time: 15:44:04, May 09, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Economic Policy Act of 2102

Details

Submitted by[?]: Capitalist Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2103

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:49:45, August 29, 2005 CET
FromRational Future
ToDebating the Economic Policy Act of 2102
MessageYou know, it was very unwise to take this to a parliamentary vote without debate first especially considering the fact that the country is on the whole pro-regulation.

The only provision I concur with is Article 5. The other 4 articles are rationally unacceptable and thus the URC will vote against them.

Date10:52:01, August 29, 2005 CET
FromCapitalist Freedom Party
ToDebating the Economic Policy Act of 2102
MessageActually, I thought about that, and I decided that my first priorities are to strength public understanding of my the CFP.

Date11:38:45, August 29, 2005 CET
FromFree Market Party
ToDebating the Economic Policy Act of 2102
MessageWe are highly annoyed to see so many proposals packaged into one bill and forced upon the Senate without proper time for debate.

Date16:52:29, August 29, 2005 CET
FromCapitalist Freedom Party
ToDebating the Economic Policy Act of 2102
MessageMeh, alright. I'll leave it for debate next time. Didnt know it'd be a big deal. *shrugs*

Date20:04:29, August 29, 2005 CET
FromUnio enim si quis Motus Populi
ToDebating the Economic Policy Act of 2102
Messagewe would not support this anyway, even if there were proper time for debate.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
     

Total Seats: 266

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

Random quote: "The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved." - Confucius

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 81