We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Immigration Policy Reform Act of 2103
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mouvement des Conservateurs
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2104
Description[?]:
| http://s13.invisionfree.com/Rildanor/index.php?showtopic=36 |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting citizenship.
Old value:: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Current: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Proposed: Citizenship is gained by passing a qualifying exam.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:17:50, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Beach Party | To | Debating the Immigration Policy Reform Act of 2103 |
| Message | I prefer a more open door policy on immigration, with the expanding job market we shouldn't limit the workforce. |
| Date | 04:24:16, August 30, 2005 CET | From |  CCP | To | Debating the Immigration Policy Reform Act of 2103 |
| Message | Honorable Colleagues, We echo the sentiments of our good Colleagues within the Beach Party, and regret that we cannot support the item in its current form. |
| Date | 11:23:42, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Immigration Policy Reform Act of 2103 |
| Message | Maybe we could reach a consensus if article 2 is adapted somehow? |
| Date | 14:05:52, August 30, 2005 CET | From | Beach Party | To | Debating the Immigration Policy Reform Act of 2103 |
| Message | Proposals with so many articales are best broken down to ensure constructive debate on how they shouldf be amended or if they have enough support to pass on their own. |
| Date | 10:53:19, August 31, 2005 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Immigration Policy Reform Act of 2103 |
| Message | I deleted proposal 2 |
| Date | 10:53:54, August 31, 2005 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Immigration Policy Reform Act of 2103 |
| Message | ...and 3, maybe we could reach a consensus about the remaining article. |
| Date | 21:41:53, August 31, 2005 CET | From | CCP | To | Debating the Immigration Policy Reform Act of 2103 |
| Message | I think that's fine. |
| Date | 12:51:19, September 01, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Socialist Party (RDL) | To | Debating the Immigration Policy Reform Act of 2103 |
| Message | This is a disgusting anti-democratic measure |
| Date | 19:35:00, September 01, 2005 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Immigration Policy Reform Act of 2103 |
| Message | Would it be possible to define that 'anti-democratic' measure please? Thanks, LD |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 99 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
| Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader |