We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Worker-State Relations Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Beluzia and Bailon
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2500
Description[?]:
| The new, socialist state should be connected with the affairs of the worker. Permission must be granted by the government before a company can fire a striking worker. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Current: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Proposed: Government approval is needed before strikers can be fired.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:25:30, December 12, 2007 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Worker-State Relations Act |
| Message | Absolutely not - under a left wing government the obvious answer would be no - then to an extreme capitalist government they would say yes. It should be up to the company - afterall it is the company that has hired them in the first place. If we start dictating to businesses how to run their company they will seek business elsewhere. |
| Date | 10:40:18, December 13, 2007 CET | From | National Socialist Imperialist League | To | Debating the Worker-State Relations Act |
| Message | Absoloutley right comrade! The State is for the People, not vice versa! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 253 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 278 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 219 |
| Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
| Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia |