We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Republic Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Union Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2505
Description[?]:
| ooc. This is a bill from the Coup leaders of the Unionist Corps, NOT the CUP. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Current: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Proposed: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The title of the head of government, who chairs the cabinet.
Old value:: Prime Minister
Current: Prime Minister
Proposed: Parliamentary Chairman
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: His Most Royal and Serene Majesty, King
Current: His Imperial and Most Excellent Royal Majesty, Maximillian of House Steuart-Carmichael, King and Monarch of Hutori, High Chieftain of the Mashacara People, Prince of Orange-Vilyan, Vanuku, Dolgava, Lourenne, Kazullia & Dorvik, Grand Duke of Geharon & Iztapalata, Duke of Stormkapp, Karzon, Carolleux & Bellemont, Count of Ackerly, Lord Sovereign of the Order of the Golden Lion, Supreme Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, Defender of the Constitution and the Faith
Proposed: Governor General
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:15:46, December 20, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Union Party | To | Debating the Republic Bill |
| Message | Long live the Unionist Corps! |
| Date | 20:17:41, December 20, 2007 CET | From | SocLib '82 | To | Debating the Republic Bill |
| Message | Ehh we don't like the names but it's a step so sure, why not. |
| Date | 11:23:38, December 21, 2007 CET | From | "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party | To | Debating the Republic Bill |
| Message | Hm...am...rather not... |
| Date | 14:58:26, December 21, 2007 CET | From | Groene ArbeidersPartij | To | Debating the Republic Bill |
| Message | We agree with SocLib: though we don't like the names, we think this is going the right direction. |
| Date | 17:21:18, December 21, 2007 CET | From | Royalist Confederacy | To | Debating the Republic Bill |
| Message | Don't even bother to put it into vote... |
| Date | 09:53:27, December 22, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Union Party | To | Debating the Republic Bill |
| Message | I actually will here. But to spice things up, I will vote no. After all, the Unionist Corps has no seats, the monarchist CUP does. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 147 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 154 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to prevent confusion by ensuring unofficial or outdated bills labelled as "Cultural Protocols" are removed from their nation page. |
| Random quote: "Since when did you care about women?" - Faith Chiang, former Gaduri politician |