We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Privacy act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Money Now Capitalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2105
Description[?]:
| Yes, while individuals do have the right to their privacy, the justice should be able to force these individuals to give them information if it is vital. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:21:49, August 31, 2005 CET | From | Money Now Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Privacy act |
| Message | We think this is very fair, but we would like to know what you think on it |
| Date | 23:11:45, August 31, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Privacy act |
| Message | Agreed. Any idea when it was changed to the current article? |
| Date | 23:54:44, August 31, 2005 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the Privacy act |
| Message | I am opposed to this. |
| Date | 17:47:31, September 01, 2005 CET | From | Money Now Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Privacy act |
| Message | No, sorry, i don't know when it was changed.. |
| Date | 18:04:22, September 01, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Privacy act |
| Message | No worries. I'm just getting a bit concerned that so many laws seem to have altered from what I can recall them to be. |
| Date | 23:12:58, September 01, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Privacy act |
| Message | No need tovote because it was put forward to late. MNCP, remember to put it back up to the vote asap when the next term of office begins. I think I am agianst this... unless you can convince me otherwise... |
| Date | 01:13:04, September 02, 2005 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the Privacy act |
| Message | http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=14323 |
| Date | 03:23:49, September 02, 2005 CET | From | Money Now Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Privacy act |
| Message | Alright, sorry about that.. it's back up to vote again |
| Date | 11:12:11, September 02, 2005 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Privacy act |
| Message | Vital how? We won't give you a list of the Peoples names! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 229 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 171 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
| Random quote: "Power always has to be kept in check; power exercised in secret, especially under the cloak of national security, is doubly dangerous." - William Proxmire |