We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Kafuristani Friendship Treaty Withdrawal
Details
Submitted by[?]: HaLeumit Tikvah
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2537
Description[?]:
| "Given the abhorrent Religion Ban in Kafuristan, a fact it seems was missed by us and the rest of the Knesset when the treaty was signed, we propose Beiteynu withdraw from this treaty as soon as possible." -Avraham Sharet |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Kafuristan-Beiteynu Friendship Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:19:37, February 23, 2008 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the Kafuristani Friendship Treaty Withdrawal |
| Message | This is completely irrelevant to the point. We did not mention the religion ban because we believed it simply did not matter. Please, contemplate on the matter deeply, before making rush decisions. Furthermore, Kafuristan is having difficulty passing anythings due to the civil war situation. Please, consider it. Yours Faithfully, Farid al-Maximilian |
| Date | 20:45:10, February 23, 2008 CET | From |  Ma'avak | To | Debating the Kafuristani Friendship Treaty Withdrawal |
| Message | "We can reconsider the treaty when Kafuristan alters its position on religion and offers long term assurances that such tyranny shall not return but until then we agree with HaLeumit Tikvah and support withdrawel." -- Rosh HaMemshala Josef Nehushtan |
| Date | 20:56:46, February 23, 2008 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Kafuristani Friendship Treaty Withdrawal |
| Message | Is this only over the religion ban or all of our religious laws? We can remove the religion ban if necessary. Are you going to withdraw from the MCTO as well? |
| Date | 21:08:47, February 23, 2008 CET | From | Am Echad, Pays Libre | To | Debating the Kafuristani Friendship Treaty Withdrawal |
| Message | yes it only for the religion ban and we will stay in the mcto |
| Date | 23:20:34, February 23, 2008 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the Kafuristani Friendship Treaty Withdrawal |
| Message | "For us, the matter of religious persecution is of the utmost importance. This is not a rushed decision; this is consistent with Beiteynuese policy for the last century. We understand and sympathise with the difficult situation in Kafuristan, however we cannot maintain a treaty of friendship with a nation so dynamically opposed to our values." -Avraham Sharet |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 240 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 160 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "The only thing that saves us from bureaucracy is its inefficiency." - Eugene McCarthy |