Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5481
Next month in: 00:02:09
Server time: 19:57:50, May 09, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): dannypk19 | hyraemous | luthorian3059 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Adoption Regulation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Socialist Party of Deltaria

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2110

Description[?]:

Recognising that some people are evil abusive sexual perverts, and understanding that there are currently no regulations on who may adopt besides the moralistic and discriminatory exclusion of gay couples, The National Socialist Party proposes the following bill.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:03:12, September 10, 2005 CET
FromSedliacke Povstanie
ToDebating the Adoption Regulation Act
MessageDo applicants include couples, singles and gay couples?

Date20:04:27, September 10, 2005 CET
FromSedliacke Povstanie
ToDebating the Adoption Regulation Act
MessageOh, my apologies. I missed Article 2. Bill supported. We're strongly in favour of government regulation.

Date20:04:48, September 10, 2005 CET
FromNational Socialist Party of Deltaria
ToDebating the Adoption Regulation Act
MessageYes, but all must be screened to prove they'd make decent parents (sexual preference/domestic arrangements notwithstanding).

Date20:11:37, September 10, 2005 CET
FromDoron Akigansk Kommunist Parti (MLN)
ToDebating the Adoption Regulation Act
MessageSexual Preferences is completely irrelevant with regards to raising a child. Unless we're talking about pedophiles and the like.

The way it stands now, the Communist Party would support this bill.

Date00:19:15, September 11, 2005 CET
FromUtilolibertarian Party
ToDebating the Adoption Regulation Act
MessageArticle 2 is terrific, although I really see no need for article 1.

Date01:33:05, September 11, 2005 CET
FromNational Socialist Party of Deltaria
ToDebating the Adoption Regulation Act
Message.... to keep adopted children out of the hands of child molesters, pornographers, pimps, and regular old drunken violent psychotics.

Date04:54:53, September 11, 2005 CET
FromMarchioness Party
ToDebating the Adoption Regulation Act
MessageThe MP strongly supports this bill.

Date07:35:15, September 11, 2005 CET
FromUtilolibertarian Party
ToDebating the Adoption Regulation Act
MessageIs there any middleground on article 1 between no regulation and strict regulation? We understand what you want to do, but we worry about excessive hassle scaring off potential parents.

Date13:54:44, September 11, 2005 CET
FromNational Socialist Party of Deltaria
ToDebating the Adoption Regulation Act
MessageExcessive hassle as opposed to raising children? The NSP stands firm on the issue, and belives anybody scared off by the "excessive hassle" of the screening process will not make fit guardians in the first place.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 100

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Parties have the ability to endorse another party's candidate for the Head of State election (if there is one). This adds a strategic element to the elections.

    Random quote: "Politics, when it is an art and a service, not an exploitation, is about acting for an ideal through realities." - Charles De Gaulle

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 75