We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: URP reform bill 12
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lodamun Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2550
Description[?]:
| OOC: Because my parties visibility on all issues are now moderate or worse I am putting up alot of bills to try and make my parties visibility stronger. Ill put them up 1 at the time so you can all vote yes or no for each bill seperatly |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, but these may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Current: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Proposed: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:28:57, March 23, 2008 CET | From | Lodamun Libertarian Party | To | Debating the URP reform bill 12 |
| Message | One thing I would like to add to this bill, the government owns all public properties so you can (rp) still issue a ban or restriction from carrying weapons on public property in a later bill |
| Date | 02:37:34, March 23, 2008 CET | From | Lodamun Libertarian Party | To | Debating the URP reform bill 12 |
| Message | Also we would like to take this one more step in that direction but we only take it one step for now |
| Date | 20:11:15, March 27, 2008 CET | From | Pariah Idealism | To | Debating the URP reform bill 12 |
| Message | Checked -approved |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 48 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 94 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 8 |
| Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
| Random quote: "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." - Thomas Jefferson |