We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protection of original works of technology and arts
Details
Submitted by[?]: Traditions' Party for elitocracy
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2556
Description[?]:
Technology and art are part of the commons and are not protected by copyright. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Protection of original works of technology and arts.
Old value:: Works of technology and art are protected by copyright.
Current: Works of techology and art have limited copy protection.
Proposed: Technology and art are part of the commons and are not protected by copyright.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:49:16, April 03, 2008 CET | From | CSA Pax et Socialism | To | Debating the Protection of original works of technology and arts |
Message | I've stumbled upon a crossroads here. The moral question of intellectual property is a dire and pressing one. |
Date | 03:58:52, April 04, 2008 CET | From | Dolgarian Federal Party (DAAS) | To | Debating the Protection of original works of technology and arts |
Message | CSA and DFF are agreeing on a property issue. The end of the world is imminent. |
Date | 14:02:23, April 04, 2008 CET | From | CSA Pax et Socialism | To | Debating the Protection of original works of technology and arts |
Message | No, not property, definitely not. Intellectual property. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 173 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 267 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 115 |
Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
Random quote: "The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites.'" - Larry Hardiman |